🚀 go-pugleaf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <DJoA0C.r3@freenet.carleton.ca> Colin R. Leech 
(ag414@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:

> Somehow, I don't think that being quiet was high on Lepine's list of
> priorities at that point. Line-of-sight isn't a problem since he wanted to
> see his victims - he was only interested in killing women, after all.
> Sophisticated terrorists may use more elaborate schemes such as gas, but
> the simple way for a crazed madman to inflict damage is to pick up his gun.

You give a criminal (Lepine) and a criminal act as an example problem
(massacre), but you give infringement of responsible firearm owners as the
solution (C-68). Very strange logic.

> I think my point was pretty clear: guns are attractive because they are so
> easy to pick up and use ont hespur of the moment. That's why domestic
> violence involves guns and knives, for example, but not gas or bombs.

Domestic violence involves any and all inanimate objects that may be around
the home at the time of the incident. Are you suggesting we should ban
everything, or are you simply talking hypocricy?

- -- 
               SysOp, CUE Here BBS  (403) 465-7715
                 Roger_Walker@CUEHere.bohica.net
               Roger_Walker@CUEHere.Edmonton.AB.CA

    PGP Public Key from:  Roger_Walker_PGP@CUEHere.Edmonton.AB.CA


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMNjU4aZ872JZyB+1AQEXhgf8CbyUlOEvok0A6QgKmrOGwB1+iCcfbAa2
nZ0wYnM+a77AE3MUtzfjwc0po1jCZ/AgeEKtI3tc1NX+71H062luQ+6GB7n35yg3
DOWcQBYFeYJajy8XF4IJGNh3Lu8/iFKN7IENUwL+MfOek5Jp27pXsljL8a9xZMpQ
2b0HjdGyKtYEDos5QOEQtA0TX3AZb7FxRja51hcDsIemMLofYnngAg7yA8v+lhQa
u3C1rI7/xhWNdkpKMUFdUnvCh/WDLHjJtx0AVhjZkZg0J/gZdh/eUllLvrLGVCNm
mgjtDBsH8yZ5TwEzIOBNk5x3D+clmuvLD6tdDrF9Ni8Y6TDtPvr/sg==
=hTKR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----