🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <7220354258103@c00507-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu>, cddukes@c00507-119rd.eos.ncsu.edu (PakRat's Anonymous) writes:

(intro deleted)

|>IE abortion may be completely against your beliefs.  But will you be
|>like the folks that think the idea of a meatless meal is horrible, and
|>ban someone from their only food?  Or will you be unable to eat pork,
|>and trying your damndest to keep the pork eaters from eating what 
|>they desire?  Or will you go for a compromise where you don't do what
|>you don't want, but you also don't keep someone from doing something
|>they desire to do.
|>

This idea will never fly with those who make no distinction (sp?) between
abortion and murder, unless you also let people who see nothing wrong with
offing the guy across the street to go ahead and do it.

On another point, and while many doubtless realize this, I'll point out that
people, regardless of their beliefs, are being forced to pay for abortions
(through our wonderful government).

|>Chris "the PakRat" Dukes______________________________cddukes@eos.ncsu.edu
|>Gooey Dough Crepe Axe GDC-23A, the newest weapon in
|>handheld tactical sustenance warfare.
|>PGP key available upon request
|>

Chris Port