🚀 go-pugleaf

IO11283@MAINE.MAINE.EDU writes:

>I think ne.personals is a great idea ...
>... Personally I vote for the traditional definition of New England
>... doesn't stop people from NY from replying to posts, but there has to
>be a limit somewhere ...
>Yes, These views are mine own. And yours?

By an amazing coincidence, my views are also my own!

So here's another "yes" vote.  If I'm still logged in to a computer at
this time of night, it's probably a matter of life & death, eh?

Subvotes:

 - ne.singles instead of ne.personals.  "Single" is a matter of fact;
   "personals" has such a-- well --*personal* connotation.  Musn't have
   that.  Then again, I'd also hate to inhibit married people from
   getting personal, so maybe "personals" is better after all.
   Compromise:  I couldn't care less.  Honest.  Although I prefer
   "singles".

 - Limited to whatever geographic area "ne" in the Distribution header
   field is supposed to represent; presumably that's already been decided
   by people who know far more than can be told.  If you're reading this
   msg, an "ne" distribution from here made it to your site.

letting-you-guess-whether-i'm-speaking-for-my-employer-ly y'rs  - tim

Tim Peters   Kendall Square Research Corp
tim@ksr.com,         ksr!tim@uunet.uu.net