Article View: ne.general
Article #1236Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?)
From: Mike Sullivan
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:51
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:51
20 lines
1188 bytes
1188 bytes
Someone Said: > >I agree. There should be a ne.singles rather than a ne.personals so >that there will be a place to discuss and announce singles activities. >However, I think there should also be a group called ne.personals.ads >which in theory would be a write-only group where people can post ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >personal ads. HMMMM!!!!! :-) That would certainly protect everyones anonymity! I think we should not try to over engineer this thing. If ne.singles gets overcrowded with SWM ISO SWF's we can deal with it at that point, but there is no point in building an alt.* style hier(an)archy. (ie ne.singles.peronals.ads.nice.guys.with.hair) If we shoot for a simple and easy to accomplish goal we have a better chance of making it happen. mike
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0CHtx.83u@merk.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!ceylon!hsdndev!spdcc!merk!mikeReferences:
<105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!ceylon!hsdndev!spdcc!merk!mike From: mike@merk.com (Mike Sullivan) Newsgroups: ne.general Subject: Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?) Message-ID: <C0CHtx.83u@merk.com> Date: 4 Jan 93 19:51:32 GMT References: <105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com> Organization: Technology Partners, Inc. Lines: 20