🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.general
Article #1236

Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?)

#1236
From: Mike Sullivan
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 19:51
20 lines
1188 bytes
Someone Said:
>
>I agree.  There should be a ne.singles rather than a ne.personals so
>that there will be a place to discuss and announce singles activities.
>However, I think there should also be a group called ne.personals.ads
>which in theory would be a write-only group where people can post
			    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>personal ads.

HMMMM!!!!! :-)
That would certainly protect everyones anonymity!
I think we should not try to over engineer this thing.  If ne.singles gets
overcrowded with SWM ISO SWF's we can deal with it at that point, but there
is no point in building an alt.* style hier(an)archy.

(ie ne.singles.peronals.ads.nice.guys.with.hair)
If we shoot for a simple and easy to accomplish goal we have a better chance
of making it happen.

mike
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C0CHtx.83u@merk.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!ceylon!hsdndev!spdcc!merk!mike
References: <105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!ceylon!hsdndev!spdcc!merk!mike
From: mike@merk.com (Mike Sullivan)
Newsgroups: ne.general
Subject: Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?)
Message-ID: <C0CHtx.83u@merk.com>
Date: 4 Jan 93 19:51:32 GMT
References: <105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com>
Organization: Technology Partners, Inc.
Lines: 20