Article View: ne.general
Article #1240Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?)
From: Gerald Pulver
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 23:07
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 23:07
11 lines
1200 bytes
1200 bytes
In article <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com> drg@candidus.ma30.bull.com (Daniel R. Guilderson) writes: >I agree. There should be a ne.singles rather than a ne.personals so >that there will be a place to discuss and announce singles activities. >However, I think there should also be a group called ne.personals.ads >which in theory would be a write-only group where people can post >personal ads. What is a 'write-only' group? Wouldn't seem very useful. BTW, I'm in favor of ne.singles and/or ne.personals, so long as "ne" is taken to mean "North East".
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.230743.22159@news.columbia.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!gpReferences:
<105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: ne.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!gp From: gp@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Gerald Pulver) Subject: Re: ne.singles? (was Re: ne.personals?) Message-ID: <1993Jan4.230743.22159@news.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News) Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixf.cc.columbia.edu Reply-To: gp@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Gerald Pulver) Organization: Columbia University References: <105906@bu.edu> <1i46ltINN6jg@FUNCTOR.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU> <DRG.93Jan4122445@candidus.ma30.bull.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 23:07:43 GMT Lines: 16