🚀 go-pugleaf

spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua) writes:
>In article <106114@bu.edu> sklarew@bass.bu.edu (daniel sklarew) writes:
><ne.singles : for the singles scene in ne
><ne.personals.ads: for those ISO-types out there
><While the gist seems similar, I think that each appeals to a different
><audience, thus confirming our need for both...
>
>        I don't think the likely level of traffic warrants two groups.
>I suggest creating ne.singles and if it becomes overrun with personal
>ads then think about ne.personals or ne.personals-ads
>(ne.personals.ads is a bad name unless you are going to have a bunch
>of ne.personals.* groups).

I agree that two groups are not warranted at the present time, and
that "ne.personals.ads" is not a good choice.
Net tradition would favor the "ne.singles" name 
(or maybe "ne.motos"? :)

>        Since the have been no objections to the idea of the group I
>will set it up as soon as an agreement on the name is reached.
>
>->Spike

By the way, obviously (and thankfully) distribution fields do not limit 
the audience that much, but it would be nice if posts to ne.singles (or 
whatever it is called) were from people who actually spend time in
New England.

If someone creates the new group, could they please let me know (by
a post to ne.general or via email?)

Jim Kowalczyk            James_J_Kowalczyk@cup.portal.com
Andover, MA