Article View: ne.general
Article #1286ne.companions? (was Re: ne.singles && ne.personals.ads)
From: daniel sklarew
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 04:41
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 04:41
47 lines
2764 bytes
2764 bytes
Brief summary for newcomers: > spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua) writes: > I don't think the likely level of traffic warrants two groups. > I suggest creating ne.singles and if it becomes overrun with > personal ads then think about ne.personals or ne.personals-ads > Someone's reply: >Ads are >extremely annoying to people who simple want to discuss things and it >is a pain to wade through discussions when all you really want is to >read ads. I don't think the lack of traffic will be an issue for very >long. And when the traffic finally does get to be a problem it is >difficult to get people to adjust to the creation of a new group. >I think most of the participants in this discussion >are looking for a place for singles to gather not a place for "mates" >to gather. *** Ok., here's my point: I originally suggested the ne.personals *** newgroup for reasons not too different from this "mates" argument. *** Although I am not anti-social, I have never been into the meet/meat *** singles scene. :( *** *** So, while I may not find a mate, I *am* interested in creating a *** a local newsgroup which could help people who are not getting what *** they want from the singles scene (no flames please) -- those ISO *** personal contact with people of similar interests/pursuits & locality. (Is that really so sleazy?) Enough stars (sorry 'bout that). The first person to propose ne.singles appeared to have much different objectives. I tentatively agree with "Someone's reply" above that we are really talking about distinct audiences and formats for each newsgroup. Spike, could you (or anyone else) suggest how we might clearly and cordially combine these groups? If this appears unlikely, could we possibly start with 2 and just kill the one that has fizzled in 6 months? SM ISO ne.companions . . . (!) (ne.ISO ne.friendship ne.date-line ne.party-line ne.company ne.saturday-night ne.hugs ne.brew ne.the-scene ne.codependents ne.members-only ne.sgt.peppers ne.make-me-an-offer ne.whisk-me-away-from-this-darn-terminal, etc.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<106251@bu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!bass.bu.edu!sklarewReferences:
<SPIKE.93Jan4170235@world.std.com> <72882@cup.portal.com> <DRG.93Jan5160521@candidus.ma30.bull.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!rutgers!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bu.edu!bass.bu.edu!sklarew From: sklarew@bass.bu.edu (daniel sklarew) Newsgroups: ne.general Subject: ne.companions? (was Re: ne.singles && ne.personals.ads) Message-ID: <106251@bu.edu> Date: 6 Jan 93 04:41:59 GMT References: <SPIKE.93Jan4170235@world.std.com> <72882@cup.portal.com> <DRG.93Jan5160521@candidus.ma30.bull.com> Sender: news@bu.edu Reply-To: sklarew@bass.bu.edu (daniel sklarew) Followup-To: ne.general Organization: Boston University Lines: 47