Re: RFD: A singles discussion group for the ne distribution

Article View: ne.general

Article #1425

#1425

From: Joe Ilacqua
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 23:41

17 lines
1305 bytes

drg@candidus.ma30.bull.com (Daniel R. Guilderson) writes:
<ne.singles (unmoderated)
<Charter: For discussion and announcement of singles related activities
<and experiences in the New England area.
<ne.personals (unmoderated)
<Charter: For the posting of personal advertizements.  Any discussion
<arising from posts in this group should be shifted to ne.singles.

	I still think one group (ne.singles) is enough to start.  I do
not believe they will be enough traffic to justify two groups, and if
it turns out I'm wrong, I see no problem with creating "ne.personals"
after the fact.  I don't think "momentum" is an issue, because the
anonymous posting software (which I am willing to set up), can easily
be moved from "ne.singles" to "ne.personals" if "ne.singles" becomes
overrun.

->Spike

Technical Details

Message-ID: <SPIKE.93Jan9184148@world.std.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!spike

References: <DRG.93Jan8174053@candidus.ma30.bull.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: ne.general,ne.motss
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!spike
From: spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua)
Subject: Re: RFD: A singles discussion group for the ne distribution
In-Reply-To: drg@candidus.ma30.bull.com's message of 8 Jan 93 17:40:53
Message-ID: <SPIKE.93Jan9184148@world.std.com>
Sender: spike@world.std.com (Joe Ilacqua)
Organization: Software Tool & Die
References: <DRG.93Jan8174053@candidus.ma30.bull.com>
Distribution: ne
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 23:41:48 GMT
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message