🚀 go-pugleaf

Andy Walton <atticus@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:<161120041824041434%atticus@mindspring.com>...

Things are boring up on Walton mountain. Poor Andy is forced to beat
his meat looking at pics in a 17 year old Sears catalog.

Jay


> In article <c8tkp0levqbpisn0n1soqgpq8cjjn4njl5@4ax.com>, Gary James
> <gnjames43@OMITyahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:28:04 -0500, FACE <AFaceintheCrowd@today.net>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > >On 15 Nov 2004 14:08:43 -0800, tomfiege9@yahoo.com (Jim) wrote:
> > >
> > >>> 2004 NationalVanguard.org and the National Alliance.
> > >>
> > >>Jim
> > >
> > >I note your source.  
> > 
> > Note it hell,  I went and read it.
> 
> Yeah, I did that in younger years, when I had more time on my hands. I
> used to argue with online neo-Nazis on a daily basis, read their
> screeds and dissect them point by point. Anyone so inclined can search
> for my e-mail address on Google groups and check out my oeuvre on
> alt.politics.white-power. 
> 
> It won't be a quick read.
> 
> Eventually I learned, in the wisdom that can only be earned through
> experience, that trying to wrassle with a pig just makes you dirty, and
> the pig enjoys it more often than you do. 
> 
> I came to realize that the time I spent arguing with them gave them
> more of a slice of my life, and more legitimacy, than they deserved. I
> decided that my time was better spent addressing opponents and lurkers
> who are at least marginally reasonable. 
> 
> Most of my erstwhile opponents apparently saw the same light. The
> leading Aryan lights of 1995-6 have, almost to a man, repudiated the
> "cause." I won't name them, because I respect their goal of building a
> useful life. But the Internet has a long memory, and a determined
> researcher won't have to work very hard to come up with names.
> 
> If the National Alliance says that ice is cold and water is wet, I
> won't believe either without independent corrobboration.
> 
> Calling them morons would be a a gross insult to the developmentally
> disabled, who might one day learn to tie their shoes and catch a bus.
> Calling them shit would be a disservice to feces, which creates an
> environment in which something worthwhile can grow. Calling them
> assholes would be an insult to anuses. Calling them pricks would be an
> insult to penises, to those who have them and to those who enjoy them.
> 
> I don't think I've made myself clear enough.
> 
> Every electron that zings to or from the National Alliance Web site
> would be more productive if it were spent on artificial insemination of
> sows. Every molecule of oxygen that passes through the lungs of a
> neo-Nazi would benefit the world more if it were breathed by an amoeba.
> Every moment of thought devoted to National Alliance propaganda would
> be more productive -- or at least lest destructive -- if applied to the
> latest season of "Survivor."
> 
> If every thought -- and every neural twitch that passes for thought --
> spent on the Nazis were devoted to useful pursuits, we'd have cured
> cancer by now.