🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.general
Article #1781

Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)

#1781
From: EllenSmith
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00
65 lines
4390 bytes
jmorgan@galstar.com (Jerry Morgan) wrote:

>>>yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) wrote:

>>>>jmorgan@galstar.com (Jerry Morgan) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Does this mean that DOJ does not feel that men are also victims of
>>>>>>>violence, or simply are not worth the effort to create an office to
>>>>>>>address the issue?
>>>>
>>>>You could always call them and ask them I guess.
>>>>
Why was this terse? Lots of people give one line answers, why write
more lines than you need to? I didn't mean for it to be terse. That's
all I had to say.

>>>Gosh, such a terse reply.  Did my previous posting answer all your
>>>questions? Evidently so.

No, not really. But I didn't feel up to arguing with you.

>>>In regards to calling them, there's really no need as the old saying
>>>goes "actions speak louder than words" and their inaction on the issue
>>>says a lot.

Well, inaction is like that I guess. Good ole inaction saves the day
time after time, no?

>>>And all this time, I though that you supported the premise that women
>>>and men were equal. Sorry, I must have been mistaken.

I never said I thought they were totally equal. I don't know where you
picked up that idea.

>>>I guess that men are not equal  at deserving  "protection". 

>>>Hmmm.  

>>>Maybe, just maybe that's why combat has always been considered a duty
>>>for the males, where they *protect* the women and children.

>>>My gosh, even the U.S. Department of Justice recognizes that women
>>>need extra protection, so that must make it official and maybe end the
>>>debate pertaining to women in combat.

I just think that a lot of women could do just as well as a lot of
men. Not all men are cut out for combat either. I knew a man who said
he spent the whole war peeling potatoes. Now, I could do that.
Obviously, he wasn't in combat if peeling potatoes. But I'm sure there
are a lot of other women who would be bored peeling potatoes. Let's
not use potatoes, that just popped out. Let's use....working in the
mess hall, and working the ice cream machine. Now, I could work the
machine if it's the kind like they have at Western Sizzlin. I could
probably be *taught* to use another kind, if it wasn't run by a
computer :) Now, I'm sure there are tons of women who would be bored
working the ice cream machine and would rather be in combat, and would
be of more service to their country. Inversely, I'm sure there are
some men who wouldn't be that great in combat, but would probably
be better working the ice cream machine. So he and I could work the
machine and the other people could go kill people. So?

Isn't this the thread where we  were talking about the department of
justice not having centers for men who were victims of abuse?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <51nlt3$c80@ionews.ionet.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <322F5E39.369E@ids2.idsonline.com> <50o5s0$6kg@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <322ff125.30314810@news.galstar.com> <50pk1c$b3a@nova.dimensional.com> <50qb4o$7117@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxDMAt.MpG@netcom.com> <50tigi$7129@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxFwBE.93w@netcom.com> <323674ab.29384655@news.mv.net> <51bqjl$7k1@michiganj.intr.net> <3239aa14.1818237@news.galstar.com> <51fk68$h20@ionews.ionet.net> <323bf3f2.46797198@news.galstar.com> <51ikf1$4a0@ionews.ionet.net> <323d3941.130075966@news.galstar.com> <51jsf5$atf@ionews.ionet.net> <323dc23f.2240665@news.galstar.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e4d2,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d2,public
X-Google-Thread: fff25,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfff25,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
X-Google-Thread: 10374a,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid10374a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public
From: yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith)
Subject: Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)
Date: 1996/09/18
Message-ID: <51nlt3$c80@ionews.ionet.net>
X-Deja-AN: 181258253
references: <322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <322F5E39.369E@ids2.idsonline.com> <50o5s0$6kg@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <322ff125.30314810@news.galstar.com> <50pk1c$b3a@nova.dimensional.com> <50qb4o$7117@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxDMAt.MpG@netcom.com> <50tigi$7129@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxFwBE.93w@netcom.com> <323674ab.29384655@news.mv.net> <51bqjl$7k1@michiganj.intr.net> <3239aa14.1818237@news.galstar.com> <51fk68$h20@ionews.ionet.net> <323bf3f2.46797198@news.galstar.com> <51ikf1$4a0@ionews.ionet.net> <323d3941.130075966@news.galstar.com> <51jsf5$atf@ionews.ionet.net> <323dc23f.2240665@news.galstar.com>
organization: Relentless People
newsgroups: ne.general,la.general,alt.america,nc.general,ba.general,ok.general,nv.general,ok.general,nh.general,nj.general,nm.general,ca.general,chi.general,co.general,dc.general