Article View: ne.general
Article #1781Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)
From: EllenSmith
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00
65 lines
4390 bytes
4390 bytes
jmorgan@galstar.com (Jerry Morgan) wrote: >>>yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) wrote: >>>>jmorgan@galstar.com (Jerry Morgan) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>Does this mean that DOJ does not feel that men are also victims of >>>>>>>violence, or simply are not worth the effort to create an office to >>>>>>>address the issue? >>>> >>>>You could always call them and ask them I guess. >>>> Why was this terse? Lots of people give one line answers, why write more lines than you need to? I didn't mean for it to be terse. That's all I had to say. >>>Gosh, such a terse reply. Did my previous posting answer all your >>>questions? Evidently so. No, not really. But I didn't feel up to arguing with you. >>>In regards to calling them, there's really no need as the old saying >>>goes "actions speak louder than words" and their inaction on the issue >>>says a lot. Well, inaction is like that I guess. Good ole inaction saves the day time after time, no? >>>And all this time, I though that you supported the premise that women >>>and men were equal. Sorry, I must have been mistaken. I never said I thought they were totally equal. I don't know where you picked up that idea. >>>I guess that men are not equal at deserving "protection". >>>Hmmm. >>>Maybe, just maybe that's why combat has always been considered a duty >>>for the males, where they *protect* the women and children. >>>My gosh, even the U.S. Department of Justice recognizes that women >>>need extra protection, so that must make it official and maybe end the >>>debate pertaining to women in combat. I just think that a lot of women could do just as well as a lot of men. Not all men are cut out for combat either. I knew a man who said he spent the whole war peeling potatoes. Now, I could do that. Obviously, he wasn't in combat if peeling potatoes. But I'm sure there are a lot of other women who would be bored peeling potatoes. Let's not use potatoes, that just popped out. Let's use....working in the mess hall, and working the ice cream machine. Now, I could work the machine if it's the kind like they have at Western Sizzlin. I could probably be *taught* to use another kind, if it wasn't run by a computer :) Now, I'm sure there are tons of women who would be bored working the ice cream machine and would rather be in combat, and would be of more service to their country. Inversely, I'm sure there are some men who wouldn't be that great in combat, but would probably be better working the ice cream machine. So he and I could work the machine and the other people could go kill people. So? Isn't this the thread where we were talking about the department of justice not having centers for men who were victims of abuse?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<51nlt3$c80@ionews.ionet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <322F5E39.369E@ids2.idsonline.com> <50o5s0$6kg@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <322ff125.30314810@news.galstar.com> <50pk1c$b3a@nova.dimensional.com> <50qb4o$7117@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxDMAt.MpG@netcom.com> <50tigi$7129@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxFwBE.93w@netcom.com> <323674ab.29384655@news.mv.net> <51bqjl$7k1@michiganj.intr.net> <3239aa14.1818237@news.galstar.com> <51fk68$h20@ionews.ionet.net> <323bf3f2.46797198@news.galstar.com> <51ikf1$4a0@ionews.ionet.net> <323d3941.130075966@news.galstar.com> <51jsf5$atf@ionews.ionet.net> <323dc23f.2240665@news.galstar.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e4d2,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d2,public X-Google-Thread: fff25,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidfff25,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 10374a,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10374a,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public From: yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) Subject: Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`) Date: 1996/09/18 Message-ID: <51nlt3$c80@ionews.ionet.net> X-Deja-AN: 181258253 references: <322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <322F5E39.369E@ids2.idsonline.com> <50o5s0$6kg@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <322ff125.30314810@news.galstar.com> <50pk1c$b3a@nova.dimensional.com> <50qb4o$7117@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxDMAt.MpG@netcom.com> <50tigi$7129@michiganj.intr.net> <lisareaDxFwBE.93w@netcom.com> <323674ab.29384655@news.mv.net> <51bqjl$7k1@michiganj.intr.net> <3239aa14.1818237@news.galstar.com> <51fk68$h20@ionews.ionet.net> <323bf3f2.46797198@news.galstar.com> <51ikf1$4a0@ionews.ionet.net> <323d3941.130075966@news.galstar.com> <51jsf5$atf@ionews.ionet.net> <323dc23f.2240665@news.galstar.com> organization: Relentless People newsgroups: ne.general,la.general,alt.america,nc.general,ba.general,ok.general,nv.general,ok.general,nh.general,nj.general,nm.general,ca.general,chi.general,co.general,dc.general