Article View: ne.general
Article #1784Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)
From: EllenSmith
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:00
36 lines
2697 bytes
2697 bytes
jlower@ionet.net (J. Lower) wrote: >>>In article <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net>, yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) wrote: >>>> mwwheatl@cherokee.wildstar.net (Speaker) wrote: >>>[cut] >>>> >>>The only bit that is "taboo" in U.S. thinking is the sex/nudity >>>> >>>relationship which is an artificial construct. Just because you're >>>> >>>nude around somebody doesn't mean youre going to have sex with them. >>>> >>> Silly humans... >>>> >>>> oh really? Have you ever been to a nudist colony? >>>I have. More than a few nude beaches, too. Saw thousands of naked people >>>but never saw anyone having sex. >>>For what it's worth, on the rare occasions my company went to the field >>>(Germany in the mid-70's) the women put up their own tents and pulled >>>guard duty in turn with the men. >>>Granted, we weren't infantry. Just a bunch of spooks sitting in elint >>>trucks but we only had one latrine and we took turns using it. Our >>>company was maybe 1/4 female (including the XO) and they did quite well in >>>the field. >>>I think women should be allowed into any speciality in the service that >>>they can qualify for and that the qualifications should be substantially >>>the same as for men. No comment. >>>| Jim Lower | See my fish and custom aquaria at | >>>| ^^^^^^^^^ | http://www.ionet.net/~jlower/aquarium.html | >>>| jlower@ionet.net | |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<51fk46$h20@ionews.ionet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<50vfgg$cro@ionews.ionet.net> <32367706.29987896@news.mv.net> <51d777$2ae@ionews.ionet.net> <51em9c$pmi@cherokee.wildstar.net> <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net> <jlower-1409961808370001@news.ionet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e4d2,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d2,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: fff25,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidfff25,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 10374a,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10374a,public From: yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) Subject: Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`) Date: 1996/09/14 Message-ID: <51fk46$h20@ionews.ionet.net> X-Deja-AN: 180669865 references: <50vfgg$cro@ionews.ionet.net> <32367706.29987896@news.mv.net> <51d777$2ae@ionews.ionet.net> <51em9c$pmi@cherokee.wildstar.net> <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net> <jlower-1409961808370001@news.ionet.net> organization: Relentless People newsgroups: ne.general,la.general,alt.america,nc.general,ba.general,ok.general,nv.general,ok.general,nh.general,nj.general,nm.general,ca.general,chi.general,cu.general,dc.general