🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.general
Article #1784

Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)

#1784
From: EllenSmith
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 00:00
36 lines
2697 bytes
jlower@ionet.net (J. Lower) wrote:

>>>In article <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net>, yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith) wrote:

>>>> mwwheatl@cherokee.wildstar.net (Speaker) wrote:

>>>[cut]

>>>> >>>The only bit that is "taboo" in U.S. thinking is the sex/nudity 
>>>> >>>relationship which is an artificial construct. Just because you're
>>>> >>>nude around somebody doesn't mean youre going to have sex with them.
>>>> >>>     Silly humans...
>>>> 
>>>> oh really? Have you ever been to a nudist colony?

>>>I have.  More than a few nude beaches, too.  Saw thousands of naked people
>>>but never saw anyone having sex.

>>>For what it's worth, on the rare occasions my company went to the field
>>>(Germany in the mid-70's) the women put up their own tents and pulled
>>>guard duty in turn with the men.

>>>Granted, we weren't infantry.  Just a bunch of spooks sitting in elint
>>>trucks but we only had one latrine and we took turns using it.  Our
>>>company was maybe 1/4 female (including the XO) and they did quite well in
>>>the field.

>>>I think women should be allowed into any speciality in the service that
>>>they can qualify for and that the qualifications should be substantially
>>>the same as for men.

No comment.
>>>|   Jim Lower         |     See my fish and custom aquaria at      |
>>>|   ^^^^^^^^^         | http://www.ionet.net/~jlower/aquarium.html |
>>>|   jlower@ionet.net  |                                            |
Technical Details
Message-ID: <51fk46$h20@ionews.ionet.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <50vfgg$cro@ionews.ionet.net> <32367706.29987896@news.mv.net> <51d777$2ae@ionews.ionet.net> <51em9c$pmi@cherokee.wildstar.net> <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net> <jlower-1409961808370001@news.ionet.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e4d2,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d2,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public
X-Google-Thread: fff25,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfff25,public
X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public
X-Google-Thread: f824f,f8b2c62c696fa28e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public
X-Google-Thread: 10374a,c920659657f04eed
X-Google-Attributes: gid10374a,public
From: yank@ionet.net (EllenSmith)
Subject: Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)
Date: 1996/09/14
Message-ID: <51fk46$h20@ionews.ionet.net>
X-Deja-AN: 180669865
references: <50vfgg$cro@ionews.ionet.net> <32367706.29987896@news.mv.net> <51d777$2ae@ionews.ionet.net> <51em9c$pmi@cherokee.wildstar.net> <51erpj$cfs@ionews.ionet.net> <jlower-1409961808370001@news.ionet.net>
organization: Relentless People
newsgroups: ne.general,la.general,alt.america,nc.general,ba.general,ok.general,nv.general,ok.general,nh.general,nj.general,nm.general,ca.general,chi.general,cu.general,dc.general