Article View: ne.general
Article #1825Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`)
From: Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00
48 lines
3647 bytes
3647 bytes
Forgive me for bringing the subject back to the original topic at hand [:-)] but I just want to add this, based on my own personal experiences as a veteran (US Army, circa immediately post-Vietnam) in a combat arms support position, and as someone who works regularly in the gender equity field. These are random points in no particular order: 1. It absolutely *disgusts* me that there are (thankfully somewhat more isolated, now) pockets of "women's groups" which purport to speak for "all women" (they *certainly* don't speak for me!) who still advance a theory of "qualified equality". "Equal treatment for those areas where we *want* equal treatment. In those areas where we _don't_ want equal treatment we should still be provided with a privileged status because we are the 'weaker' sex. These areas include not having to defend our country to the point of possibly losing our own lives, not having to support ourselves after divorce, and our automatically getting custody of our children (and thus more support) upon divorce simply because we are female." 2. Isn't it interesting that a large number of those women who *did* end up sent to a combat region in Desert Storm just _suddenly_ found themselves pregnant, forcing their return to the states, away from the danger zone? 3. One often (if not always) overlooked concern about women in combat (and a real one - I've seen it personally) is that many men still have deeply ingrained helping/protecting responses towards women in certain situations. These manifest in ways ranging from opening doors, to ensuring that a woman is out of harm's way to the detriment of their own safety. The *last* thing you want from a soldier on the front line, or on a mission, is his being distracted from the task at hand because he is dealing with an internal push which mandates that he must not just focus on his task, but also worry about the team mate next to him simply because she is a woman. He needs to be concentrating on his mission - not worrying about whether I am properly covering my own back. Holding his own position, not trying to protect me. -- I am: mom, attorney, fathers' rights advocate, founder of F.R.E.E.(tm) *--> Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange: www.vix.com/free or free@vix.com Inherent.Com: Website Architects to the Legal Community - anne@inherent.com Actually, I'm a lawyer -and- I play one on tv.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<516qns$ha6$1@gw.home.vix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <50ve1l$7136@michiganj.intr.net> <32344038.5EFB5C50@earthops.org> <32366a45.26722605@news.mv.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10e4d2,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10e4d2,public X-Google-Thread: 10374a,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid10374a,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: fff25,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidfff25,public X-Google-Thread: 10fa57,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gid10fa57,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,f8b2c62c696fa28e X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,c920659657f04eed X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public From: shedevil@vix.com (Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.) Subject: Re: Women involved in combat (was Re: fu&^%$#@!@#$%^&*()@#!~!`) Date: 1996/09/11 Message-ID: <516qns$ha6$1@gw.home.vix.com> X-Deja-AN: 179962008 references: <322E584F.3521@injersey.com> <50ve1l$7136@michiganj.intr.net> <32344038.5EFB5C50@earthops.org> <32366a45.26722605@news.mv.net> organization: Fathers' Rights & Equality Exchange newsgroups: ne.general,la.general,alt.america,nc.general,ba.general,ok.general,nv.general,ok.general,nh.general,nj.general,nm.general,ca.general,chi.general,cu.general,dc.general