🚀 go-pugleaf

Word Warrior wrote:
> 

> 
> >The above leap of logic is too much for my deficient emotional
> >intelligence to comprehend - or is that a nonsequitur I see?
> 
> Gawd only knows what your myopic orbs may transmit to your
> inadequately functioning cranial contents.

Great and meaningful response!  I am truly impressed.

> 
> >Carnivores kill for survival.  Judged within the context of their
> >existence, their actions are understandable.  I suspect their victims
> >have other thoughts, however.
> 
> I don't know that you are an authoritative source for information
> on thoughts of any kind or species.

And who died and left you the authority on everything?  All I'm trying
to do is express my opinion on a topic I have very strong feelings on. 
And if I can get someone like you to explain to me your rationale for
your feelings, I am that much more educated.  I must admit, I haven't
got a clue as to why you feel the way you do. And frankly, I'm tired of
trying to make sense of what you say - because you don't say anything. 
All you do is refute in an oblique way without offering any explanation
in return.

> 
> >> >Can I prove there's a relationship between how we treat the unborn and
> >> >other abhorant events.
> >> Do you claim that death is abhorrent?
> 
> >When imposed by another person, yes.  What's your point?
> 
> You haven't made sense yet.

In your opinion.  Nice easy out for you to say so.

> 

> 
> >And maybe she's alive and well - and converted.  Age is one of those fox
> >holes, you know.
> 
> I don't know.  You're the one in the fox holes.

Your fox hole is coming.  Although you strike me as one tormented soul. 
Perhaps you're there and you don't know it.  What's your quality of life
like?  How many close friends do you have?  What contributions to
anything have you made lately?  How much time have you spent trying to
figure out what your purpose is?

> 

> 
> >I was wrong.
> 
> You figure only once?

Don't recall saying how many times.  It's been lots.  But some of us
learn from our mistakes.  He who never made a mistake, never did
anything.

> 
> > In addition to expletives,emotionalism and
> >nonsequiturs,people will also respond in the form of sarcasm and puzzles
> >when they either don't have anything tangible to say or they're
> >incapable of articulating what they feel is tangible.
> 
> It's quite tangible that those with deficient EQ tend to
> imagine conflict in situations where it isn't otherwise
> descriptive of the circumstances.

EQ - let me think.  Doesn't that stand for emotional quotient?  And
isn't that the latest way to measure intelligence.  I noticed you post
to the mensa news group.  So that's what's going on here.  Gee, God does
have a sense of humor.  So you've got all that intelligence and no way
of figuring out what to do with it other than waisting your time banging
away on a keyboard entering the drivel I've seen this past week.  Why
don't you count the number of times in a day you refer to your or
someone else's intelligence?  You've got too much time on your hands. 
Get out of the house and do something worthwhile with your life.


> 
> > Can you simply
> >say what you mean
> 
> Yep.

You haven't gotten past taking to impress.  Try communicating.

> 
> > and not resort to saying things that no one else
> 
> Do you speak for everyone else?  How is that?

Gee, I don't recall saying I communicate for anyone other than myself. 
But at least I do that much.

> 
> >understands
> 
> So you didn't understand.

Now really, was I supposed to understand what you typed?  I wonder if
anyone else did.  Why don't you ask?

> 
> >in the hope that readers
> 
> For whom you wish to pretend you speak ...

I'll say it again.  I communicate for myself and no one else.  I was
hoping to connect with someone who was capable of responding with
something other than drivel.  I have always learned by talking to people
with other ideas.  I must say I learned nothing from you.

> 
> > will believe that you are the
> >holder of some deep, esoteric truth.  You haven't substantially
> >responded to a thing I said.  No surprise.
> 
> Yeah, you haven't had jack shit to say.

I knew it!!!  I knew you couldn't hold an intelligent conversation (not
that I would characterize what you have contributed as intelligent)
without resorting to expletives. 

Try looking at what's left in this posting.  I did not know that usenet
forced the poster to add more new material than is being saved.  What
started out as a sincere expression of thoughts has degraded to a boring
word chess game. Chewing gum for the mind. 

So you call yourself the word warrior.  Excellent choice of names. 
That's all you have is words.  And you like to try to impress people
with words.  Tell you what.  This has been an interesting experiment for
me, using usenet, but if you represent the typical participant, I think
I'll pass.  Good luck to you.  You need it.  Consider this exchange
over.  I have much better things to do with my time.
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> |Respectfully, Sheila          ~~~Word Warrior~~~         green@pipeline.com|
> |Obligatory tribute to the founding fathers of the United States of America:|
> | This is not to be read by anyone under 18 years of age, who should read up|
> | on history and the First Amendment to the Constitution, as an alternative.|
> | *Animals, including humans, fart, piss, shit, masturbate, fuck and abort.*|
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^