🚀 go-pugleaf

"Terence P. Garvey" <tgarvey@wsii.com> wrote:

>Word Warrior wrote:
[Terence has fucked up the attributions.  I didn't write this.]
>> >The above leap of logic is too much for my deficient emotional
>> >intelligence to comprehend - or is that a nonsequitur I see?
[I did write this.] 
>> Gawd only knows what your myopic orbs may transmit to your
>> inadequately functioning cranial contents.
>Great and meaningful response!  I am truly impressed.
So what?
>> >Carnivores kill for survival.  Judged within the context of their
>> >existence, their actions are understandable.  I suspect their victims
>> >have other thoughts, however.
>> I don't know that you are an authoritative source for information
>> on thoughts of any kind or species.
>And who died and left you the authority on everything? 
I've never claimed to be.  Please try to understand 
the words to which you attempt to respond.
> All I'm trying
>to do is express my opinion on a topic I have very strong feelings on.
So what?
Feelings aren't reason.  =Both= are useful. 
>And if I can get someone like you to explain to me your rationale for
>your feelings, I am that much more educated. 
My 'feelings' have nothing to do with it.
You sire kids, you father 'em, physically and fiscally.
Otherwise you are a pain in the economic ass, among
other things.
> I must admit, I haven't
>got a clue as to why you feel the way you do. 
(Perhaps in general, either ...)
>And frankly, I'm tired of
So go take a nap.
>trying to make sense of what you say - because you don't say anything. 
Don't pretend to read it.
>All you do is refute in an oblique way without offering any explanation
>in return.
Here's one: fuck you if you think I owe you an 'offering' of any kind.
Go get what you need but don't imagine you can impose or blame to good
effect in any way shape or form.
>> >> >Can I prove there's a relationship between how we treat the unborn and
>> >> >other abhorant events.
>> >> Do you claim that death is abhorrent? 
>> >When imposed by another person, yes.  What's your point?
>> You haven't made sense yet.
>In your opinion.  Nice easy out for you to say so.
I don't need an out.  You need something to say besides
"I should knock women up and only everyone else should deal with it."
and "All you do is [blather].".

>> >And maybe she's alive and well - and converted.  Age is one of those fox
>> >holes, you know.
>> I don't know.  You're the one in the fox holes.
>Your fox hole is coming. 

Yeah.

So what?

> Although you strike me as one tormented soul. 

I don't know if much of anything strikes you as it should.

>Perhaps you're there and you don't know it.

So you're gonna tell me all about it, huh?

Go ahead and fantasize that I writhe in 
obsequious gratitude at the foot of your
cyberpedestal for your insight.

In real life, just try to quit being such
an asshole.

>  What's your quality of life
>like?  

So what: it's immaterial.
(As compared to what?)

>How many close friends do you have? 

So what: it's immaterial.
(How many do you imagine the world owes you?)

> What contributions to
>anything have you made lately? 

So what: it's immaterial.
(If your posts are indicative of your potential
for "contributions to anything" it would be nil.)

> How much time have you spent trying to
>figure out what your purpose is?

So what: it's immaterial.
(Have you found one beyond the relentless pursuit
of ad hominem fallacy or are you completely mindless?)

>> >I was wrong.
>> You figure only once?
>Don't recall saying how many times.  It's been lots.  But some of us
>learn from our mistakes.  He who never made a mistake, never did
>anything.

How about making them repeatedly?

>> > In addition to expletives,emotionalism and
>> >nonsequiturs,people will also respond in the form of sarcasm and puzzles
>> >when they either don't have anything tangible to say or they're
>> >incapable of articulating what they feel is tangible.
>> It's quite tangible that those with deficient EQ tend to
>> imagine conflict in situations where it isn't otherwise
>> descriptive of the circumstances.

>EQ - let me think.  Doesn't that stand for emotional quotient? 

Read up and get back to me.

That you so quickly and ignorantly disparaged something
directly and accurately commenting on the findings of
doctoral-level investigators shows me that you are
not here to actually discuss the topic.

> And
>isn't that the latest way to measure intelligence.

No.  

>  I noticed you post
>to the mensa news group. 

Congratulations.  That's one.

> So that's what's going on here. 

Generalization is fallacy, too.

> Gee, God does
>have a sense of humor.  

She posts to rom regularly.

>So you've got all that intelligence and no way
>of figuring out what to do with it other than waisting your time banging
>away on a keyboard entering the drivel I've seen this past week.

You suspect I should care about your problems?

Fucking idiot: quit reading me if you don't like me.
Get someone who knows how to show you the way to ask
a computer nicely to killfile me.  Have em read and
explain the big words to you while they're at it.

>  Why
>don't you count the number of times in a day you refer to your or
>someone else's intelligence? 

There's once.  You?  At least two so far.

I defer to your superior tendency to refer to intelligence,
especially in namecalling mode.

> You've got too much time on your hands. 

Speak for yourself.  You know nothing about me, nor does it matter.

>Get out of the house and do something worthwhile with your life.

Speak for yourself.  You know nothing about me, nor does it matter.

>> > Can you simply
>> >say what you mean
>> Yep.
>You haven't gotten past taking to impress.  Try communicating.

Why don't you communicate to me what "taking to impress" might mean.

"Giving to impress" might still not have meant anything, regardless
of accuracy.

>> > and not resort to saying things that no one else 
>> Do you speak for everyone else?  How is that?
>Gee, I don't recall saying I communicate for anyone other than myself. 

Perhaps you don't do that very well either.

>But at least I do that much.

So you claim.
Specify.
 
>> >understands
>> So you didn't understand.
>Now really, was I supposed to understand what you typed?  I wonder if
>anyone else did.  Why don't you ask?

I don't give a shit, for starters ...

>> >in the hope that readers
>> For whom you wish to pretend you speak ...

>I'll say it again.  I communicate for myself and no one else. 

Congratulations.  That's two.

> I was
>hoping to connect with someone who was capable of responding with
>something other than drivel.  I have always learned by talking to people
>with other ideas.  I must say I learned nothing from you.

That's your problem.

Say something about someone from whom you've learned, and
what it may have been, or even shut the fuck up; either
would be more productive for you.
 
>> > will believe that you are the
>> >holder of some deep, esoteric truth.  You haven't substantially
>> >responded to a thing I said.  No surprise. 
>> Yeah, you haven't had jack shit to say.
>I knew it!!!  I knew you couldn't hold an intelligent conversation (not
>that I would characterize what you have contributed as intelligent)
>without resorting to expletives.

So fucking what? 

>Try looking at what's left in this posting.  I did not know that usenet
>forced the poster to add more new material than is being saved.  What

You're confusing your provider (ISP) for 'usenet'.  You should not
wander here in such a helpless state.  (I'm such a nice person.)

>started out as a sincere expression of thoughts has degraded to a boring
>word chess game. Chewing gum for the mind. 

[Whoops!  So sorry that hokker of tobacco juice fell on your shoe.]

>So you call yourself the word warrior.  Excellent choice of names.

So what: it's immaterial.
 
>That's all you have is words.

No, I have tobacco juice, dimwit.

>  And you like to try to impress people
>with words.  Tell you what.  This has been an interesting experiment for
>me, using usenet, but if you represent the typical participant, I think
>I'll pass.  Good luck to you.  You need it.  Consider this exchange
>over.  I have much better things to do with my time.

All the echo mourns your noted departure.
_____________________________________________________________________________
|Respectfully, Sheila          ~~~Word Warrior~~~         green@pipeline.com|
|Obligatory tribute to the founding fathers of the United States of America:|
| This is not to be read by anyone under 18 years of age, who should read up|
| on history and the First Amendment to the Constitution, as an alternative.|
| *Animals, including humans, fart, piss, shit, masturbate, fuck and abort.*|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^