🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:44:01 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:

>
>"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message 
>news:43767014.15599620@news.ritternet.com...
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:03:14 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"The Watcher" <don'tgo@there.com> wrote in message
>>>news:43758236.2152813@news.ritternet.com...
>>>> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:52:57 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuth1@comcast.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:45:42 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Brent P" <tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:SaqdnTd9r9NtKunenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>> In article <dl286u$1iim$1@f04n12.cac.psu.edu>, Elmo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> God's existance -- or the lack thereof -- is not an issue that can 
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> settled
>>>>>>>> by scientific methods.  Nor is it in the realm of Biology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not?  Who knows, maybe there is a signature in the 'junk' DNA. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, but since the secularists BELIEVE that there is no god, in what 
>>>>>>way
>>>>>>is
>>>>>>their "religious" fervor and zeal any different from those who believe
>>>>>>there
>>>>>>there is a God ?
>>>>>
>>>>>So long as it is a mere Belief on either side, what cause to demand
>>>>>that one be superior to the other?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Frankly, except for the side of the coin they espouse, I can't tell 
>>>>>>them
>>>>>>apart in every other aspect of their behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>>Religionists believe there Is a god.  Or gods.
>>>>>
>>>>>Atheists believe there is/are Not.
>>>>
>>>> They do? Who told you that? I'm an atheist and I don't believe that.
>>>
>>>Then you don't know the meaining of the word "Atheist".
>>
>> Wrong. I know SEVERAL meanings for it. Just because I prefer to use the 
>> one that
>> fits best doesn't mean I'm wrong, does it? Unless you've been appointed 
>> Grand
>> Poobah of the English Language, I'll continue to use that definition.
>> (snip)
>
>Then yuo're not useing the English langauge

Ah, then you HAVE been appointed Grand Poobah of the English Language? What was
your appointment date? Who appointed you?

>Why don't you use a dictionary

Was that a question?

>It will save you from lokking plain stupid.

Speaking of "lokking" plain stupid, how about if I type in ONE of the
definitions of atheism from ONE of the dictionaries I have handy. This is the
first definition listed under atheism in the Second College Edition of the
American Heritage Dictionary:

1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God.

Isn't that interesting? Just what I've been saying all along. :/
Guess that makes YOU "lokk" plain stupid, doesn't it?