🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:06:40 -0600, "D. A. Tsenuf" <DA@Tsenuf.com> wrote:

>
>"max" <betatron@earthink.net> wrote in message 
>news:dl1hah$697$1@ftupet.ftupet.com...
>> In article <v7md43-vtq.ln1@remote.clifto.com>,
>> clifto <clifto@clifto.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Brent P wrote:
>>> > In article <1131590533.936614.86460@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, 
>>> > Nexus7
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Brent P wrote:
>>> >>> In article <1131050104.337390.53060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, 
>>> >>> Nexus7
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> > Every day their numbers are growing. The mechanization of America 
>>> >>> > is
>>> >>> > inevitable.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> As time goes on, you sound more and more like Rush Limbaugh.
>>> >>
>>> >> As usual, you've missed the point entirely. Hint: Check the spelling.
>>> >
>>> > I got the point exactly. Sounds like a comparison limbaugh would make.
>>>
>>> Fear Limbaugh. He demonstrates the stupidity of liberals in language
>>> even liberals can understand.
>>
>> what does america's truth detector say about the talibanization of
>> science in kansas?
>>
>
>What talibanzation of science in Kansas ?
>As an Agnostic who studied theology under Jesuits and Calvinists. I can't 
>help but laugh at the blatant ignorance of the so-called protectors of the 
>"scientific method". A process that they clearly do NOT understand...
>You should read Darwin
>You will find that Darwin himself believed in "intelligent design"

That's called an Appeal to Authority, and it's a logical fallacy. It's
irrelevant, since it doesn't matter what PRIVATE religious beliefs Darwin held.
Darwin was no more an expert on that subject than anybody else, so his opinion
counts for no more "points" than yours or mine. ;)

>This is not a battel about evolution
>It is a battle of secularists trying to eradicate the possibility that God 
>may exist

Nope. It's a battle about what is taught in SCIENCE class. If they teach
religion in science class, they're wrong.

(snip)