🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <dkenmu$3a80$1@news3.infoave.net>,
 "Sidewinder" <sidewinder@ArizU.edu> wrote:

> Er, uh, I believe the subject of the discussion was the "Mexicanization of
> America", not the "Mechanization of America".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Nexus7" <ac25kV@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1131050104.337390.53060@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > In the nineteenth century, there were very few mechanizations in
> > America. They were concentrated in agriculture and textiles. But as
> > industries noticed its benefits, they depolyed them in greater numbers.
> > They produced goods and services at low operating costs, but a
> > consistent and high quality. As a result of their poorer productivity,
> > people born in America were displaced in growing numbers from their
> > jobs, while at the same time, the overall quality of life in America
> > improved. This is called a rising tide lifts all boats, and it is the
> > reason any America-loving people don't hate mechanization. Therefore
> > mechanizations are here to stay.
> >
> > Every day their numbers are growing. The mechanization of America is
> > inevitable.
> >

I belive you're on to something here.

to wit:

In the nineteenth century, there were very few Mexicans in America. They 
were concentrated in agriculture and textiles. But as industry noticed 
their benefits, it depolyed them in greater numbers. 

They produced goods and services at low operating costs, but a 
consistent and high quality. As a result of their poorer productivity, 
people born in America were displaced in growing numbers from their 
jobs, while at the same time, the overall quality of life in America 
improved. 

This is called 'a rising tide lifts all boats,' and it is the reason any 
America-loving people don't hate Mexicanization. Therefore Mexicans are 
here to stay.

Every day their numbers are growing. The Mexicanization of America is 
inevitable.