Article View: ne.general
Article #2591Re: A question to think about......
From: Melissa
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 00:00
48 lines
2958 bytes
2958 bytes
In article <36620f82.3305864@news1.newscene.com>, not@here.org (guess away) wrote: [..] >>>Must be damn close to 100%, hunh, if the Catholic Church's messages >>>are to blame. >> >>Well Catholics aren't perfect either. Ever heard of the term "cafeteria >>Catholic"? Someone who picks & chooses what they'll follow. So they could be >>kept totally ignorant of modern birth control methods ( because the church >>tells them that ) and be having babies in, and out of wedlock, who the heck >>knows? > >Now you're just grasping at straws. :) > >The RCC isn't my religion of choice, but I don'r rhink it is the cause >for all things bad in the world. I never said it was, *did* I? >Overpopulation is the result of too >many people and not enough predation in the system. People like to >have sex, and the direct result of that unless you make birth control >or abortion mandatory is that the population is going to explode. AND the RCC is against all meaningful forms of BC, aren't they?! ( if you think abstinence and rhythm are meaningful, we'll throw you in the same room with a hot member if the opposite sex, using just them, and see ) >I predict that in the next 20 years, China will stop being so polite >about its expansionist policies and will start the next major war, >perhaps the 'Big One' unless they start enforcing totalitarian >measures for population control. They already have, or didn't you hear? Infanticide is common there on female newborns and the state has mandated no more than one child per couple or they get forced into an abortion. Both of which totally stink and are totalitarian as hell. I'd much rather see it done freely through education, propaganda, and freely available BC means. That's my opinion - Melissa "It's not easy being cute." - The Warner Brothers' sister Dot. To email me, remove the spam proofing capital letters on each side of the @ in my email address.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36622293.0@news.mho.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<365D5904.FD059FD3@nh.ultranet.com> <73kjng$j72$1@paperboy.ids.net> <365deb89.0@news.mho.net> <365ff037.34232649@vnntp.ma.ultranet.com> <365f399f.0@news.mho.net> <73rq1j$c3j$2@paperboy.ids.net> <3661b53b.0@news.mho.net> <73sebh$5re$10@paperboy.ids.net> <3661cb50.0@news.mho.net> <36620f82.3305864@news1.newscene.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101eb4,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid101eb4,public X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,52806a22d8c9be3e X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public From: Melissa9Z@Zmho.net (Melissa) Subject: Re: A question to think about...... Date: 1998/11/30 Message-ID: <36622293.0@news.mho.net> X-Deja-AN: 416978808 References: <365D5904.FD059FD3@nh.ultranet.com> <73kjng$j72$1@paperboy.ids.net> <365deb89.0@news.mho.net> <365ff037.34232649@vnntp.ma.ultranet.com> <365f399f.0@news.mho.net> <73rq1j$c3j$2@paperboy.ids.net> <3661b53b.0@news.mho.net> <73sebh$5re$10@paperboy.ids.net> <3661cb50.0@news.mho.net> <36620f82.3305864@news1.newscene.com> X-Trace: 29 Nov 1998 21:44:03 -0700, 206.26.105.139 Organization: Dis Newsgroups: ne.general,dc.general,fl.general,co.general