🚀 go-pugleaf

Howard Berkowitz wrote:
> In article <cq4ag1$gaa$1@reader2.panix.com>, 
> EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> 
> 
>>In ne.politics W. K. Mahler StreamABill Media 
>><williamkmahlerNOSPAMHERE@nospamtheremahlersfinitedot.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>who'd nuke us without my permission for what?
>>
>>Hopefully, Bill, nobody.
>>
>>
>>
>>>them there windfarm activisits, pro and con.
>>
>>I think that renewable energy is an important national security issue.  
>>I'd rather pour money into renewable energy than pour money into buying 
>>guns and bombs to defend oil.  The windfarms are not an impact-less 
>>addition to our energy production.  But then, neither is the importation 
>>of foreign oil.
>>
>>IMO, we neeed to stress conservation and renewable sources, and we need 
>>to wean ourselves, as quickly as possible, from oil.
> 
> 
> This is an interesting point when one considers the Global War on 
> Terror, silly label as it may be [1]. Many theorists differentiate 
> between Strategy and Grand Strategy.  Strategy remains a military 
> responsibility, and has broad objectives such as establishing theaters 
> of operation.  
> 
> Grand Strategy goes beyond the classical Clausewitz definition of war 
> being an extension of national policy by other means. It includes 
> diplomacy, propaganda, clandestine operations, and economic warfare.  
> Reducing oil dependency could well fall under the heading of economic 
> warfare.
> 
> [1] Mind you, when I think of an even sillier term, the Coalition
>     Of the Willing and its unfortunate acronym, I tend to want to
>     refer to the other side as the Movement Of the Opposition, at
>     least providing symmetrical silly acronyms.

Howard, I thought invoking the COW or MOO thing was not a good thing. 
Is this some Communist Plot to incite discord among the contented?

Ed
USA Ret