🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.general
Article #2797

Re: breach of netiquette

#2797
From: David Chesler
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 1995 00:00
54 lines
2927 bytes
In article <DDy1u2.9Fw@world.std.com>,
Stephen Boursy <boursy@world.std.com> wrote:
>In article <ucvirkpsex.fsf@pace.picante.com>,
>Grant Taylor <gtaylor@pace.picante.com> wrote:
>>Please respond or I will be forced to continue assuming you only
>>answer questions which you can easily avoid or where you can sneak
>>unfounded accusations into the answer.
>
>	You know Grant--if I responded to all that addressed me 

You do.

>people would go nuts claiming I was over-running the group.  Not 

They do.  (Although up in the middle of the night monitoring
a baby, I've had a lot of free time on my hands.  It's this or TV.)

>	If you have clear question that hasn't already been addressed 
>please present it in a concise and non-insulting manner and I'll 
>address it if it's rational.

 In the bandwidth you spent explaining why you weren't answering Grant,
you could have answered his question, which is concise, rational,
and not more insulting than most reductos ad absurdum.  He asked:

} I note that you neglected to respond to my post
} <uc20ujcltg.fsf@pace.picante.com> about your using dozens of
} companies' names and facilities with each of your posts.  As long as
} we're poking at your weak arguments, let's ask you this again:
} 
}   Which of the following are you speaking for (I assume all of them):
} 
}   TeraNet, Inc.
}   Bitstream
}   NearNet/BBN
}   WPI
}   Mathworks
}   Georgia Tech
}   Sprint
}   UUNet
}   Software Tool and Die
} 
}   Your post both contains the name of every one of these companies, and
}   uses facilities owned by each of the companies.

 In other words, if you are going to claim that a poster whose address
and signature contain Tufts, or Thinking Machines, or MIT, is representing
those organizations, why are you not representing these whose name
appeared in your posts, and who forwarded same?
--
David Chesler (chesler@tiac.net - CURRENT   chesler@world.std.com - SOMETIMES
             dchesler@jurisoft.com - WORK   david@chesler.absol.com - ALWAYS)

Welcome Lauren Rose Chesler, born July 13, 1995.  http://www.absol.com/~lauren/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <41p9gm$lef@sundog.tiac.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <mckenzie.136.121DB2A5@connectmmic.net> <DDx3Fz.9rE@world.std.com> <ucvirkpsex.fsf@pace.picante.com> <DDy1u2.9Fw@world.std.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 100ecf,a3a90ad3b052456a
X-Google-Attributes: gid100ecf,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130cb,cffb550a78e53e2e
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130cb,public
X-Google-Thread: ff174,a3a90ad3b052456a
X-Google-Attributes: gidff174,public
X-Google-Thread: 1085e3,799ef242c91381cc
X-Google-Attributes: gid1085e3,public
From: chesler@sunspot.tiac.net (David Chesler)
Subject: Re: breach of netiquette
Date: 1995/08/27
Message-ID: <41p9gm$lef@sundog.tiac.net>
X-Deja-AN: 108957921
references: <mckenzie.136.121DB2A5@connectmmic.net> <DDx3Fz.9rE@world.std.com> <ucvirkpsex.fsf@pace.picante.com> <DDy1u2.9Fw@world.std.com>
organization: The Internet Access Company
newsgroups: ne.general,alt.culture.usenet,earth.general,news.admin.policy