🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.singles
Article #103

Re: Men As "Success Objects" & Women As "Sex Objects"

#103
From: Ron Petersen
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 00:00
131 lines
6345 bytes
*Form Flame**Form Flame**Form Flame**Form Flame**

Dear:
 [x] Clueless Newbie         [ ] Lamer       [ ] Pirate
 [ ] "Me too" er             [ ] Pervert     [ ] Geek
 [x] Spammer                 [x] Nerd        [x] Elvis
 [ ] Fed                     [x] Freak       [ ] Scientologist
 [ ] Scammer                 [ ] Dumbass     [x] Pre-teen
 [ ] Hooker		     [ ] Pimp        [ ] Moron

You Are Being Flamed Because:
 [ ] You posted binaries in pieces LESS than 5000 lines
 [ ] You posted something asking for warez sites
 [ ] You quoted an ENTIRE post in your reply
 [ ] You continued a long, stupid thread
 [x] You started an off-topic thread
 [ ] You posted a "YOU ALL SUCK" message
 [x] You posted a blatantly obvious troll
 [x] You crossposted your blatantly obvious troll to SIXTY newsgroups
 [ ] You posted pretending to be someone famous (See "troll" above)
 [ ] You replied to the above message type believing it was someone
famous
 [ ] You said "me too" to something
 [ ] You suck
 [ ] Your sig/alias/server sucks
 [ ] You posted a stupid pyramid money making scheme and claimed it
was
legal
 [ ] You posted a stupid pyramid money making scheme and claimed IT
WORKS
 [ ] You posted asking for/selling phone sex lines
 [ ] I think you might be a fed
 [ ] You posted in ElItE CaPiTaLs because you think that makes you
cool
 [ ] You didn't do anything specific, but appear to be so generally
     worthless that you are being flamed anyway

To Repent, You Must:

 [x] Give up your Internet access
 [ ] Tell your Mommy you've been a bad boy
 [x] Jump into a bathtub while holding your monitor
 [ ] Actually post something relevant
 [ ] Read the FAQ
 [ ] Be the guest of honor in alt.flame for a month
 [x] Go see the therapist you fired three months ago

In Closing, I'd Like to Say:

 [x] Blow me
 [x] Get a life
 [x] Never post again
 [ ] Age 10 more years before you post again
 [ ] I pity your dog
 [x] You couldn't do anything with a brain if you had one
 [ ] You obviously have a very small penis (if any)
 [ ] Go to hell
 [ ] Yer momma's so fat/stupid/ugly that etc...
 [ ] Get fucked, you pathetic loser
 [ ] All of the above

end flame
lampas@alexlam.com (Alex Lam) wrote:

>>yng@firefly.prairienet.org (Y Ng) wrote:

>>:Alex Lam (lampas@alexlam.com) wrote:

>>: It's perfectly okay that either the male or the female to initiate sex.
>>: I believe either side should try to initiate sex if / when he/she feels
>>: the needs to have it. And the other side should try to accommodate
>>: whenever it is possible. 


>>	alex, you must be a regular reader of Ann Landers or watching
>>	too many infor-mercial TV on how to make a marriage like second
>>	honeymoon. did you spend $29.99 on those tapes? :) try to put
>>	the theory into practice is a different story. i do hope you
>>	will find your self a dream mate who will accommodate your
>>	sexual needs whenever possible. keep dreaming!!!!
>>	when you become old and unable to erect and she wants three
>>	times a day, can you accommodate?

>I do not process, or have seen any of the video tape you mentioned. 
>In fact, I don't even know who Ann Landers is! No, I don't watch that
>much t.v.

>I understand that it's not always possible to get it everytime you want it.
>But, it doesn't mean it is impossible either. No, I'm not dreaming. But it
>doesn't hurt to try either ! As long as either one of the partner does not
>turning down the request/initiation on a regular basis, then I think they'll
>be alright afterall.

>Sorry. I'm not that old yet ! : )

>It's all up to the involving parties.  It's entirely THEIRS decision in
>how to approach sex.  But either gender do the initiation should be
>fine.

>When you get older, and when physical ability is becoming an issue,
>then the couple SHOULD work out other means to satisfy the other
>partner.  Again, they should both do fine IF they are both open minded
>people, and are willing to try alternative means.

>>: I believe some do, but please don't use sex as a weapon to get 
>>: what you want; or you'll be degrading yourself to street walkers' level!

>>	by the way, if you don't get it, do you masturbate?
>>	would the partner feel offended?  i hope Joan would answer
>>	this question.

>I haven't encounter this problem yet.  
>But I'll let you know when I do.

>Hey Joan.  Where are you? : )
>We need your med opinion here!

>Alex Lam.
>>: Alex Lam.




>--
>//Alex Lam's Virtual Studio.  http://www.alexlam.com/users/lampas/ 
>// U.S. Air Power :  http://www.alexlam.com/users/lampas/airpower.htm/
>// Looking for original art, story, etc to be published on my web site.
>// Please reply by email to <lampas@alexlam.com> if interested. 
>//Think For Yourself.Question Authority(T. Leary)-Give Peace A Chance.(J. Lennon)//
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4pm9r5$b2n@sr.radiks.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <DrBL7p.BKt@world.std.com> <4nqoll$cpm@neon.house.gov> <4nu2jj$mon@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com> <4nv4l6$b86@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4nviv4$ck5@transfer.stratus.com> <4o13bl$dih@news01.deltanet.com> <4o1n4g$im0@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4o39hn$199@news02.deltanet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Thread: fbd31,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public
X-Google-Thread: 110235,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public
X-Google-Thread: 1157d8,32f96041220938f8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1157d8,public
X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public
X-Google-Thread: fd3ab,32f96041220938f8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ab,public
X-Google-Thread: fd08c,5663f04b19d9ba8b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd08c,public
From: reiners@radiks.net (Ron Petersen)
Subject: Re: Men As "Success Objects" & Women As "Sex Objects"
Date: 1996/06/12
Message-ID: <4pm9r5$b2n@sr.radiks.net>
X-Deja-AN: 159778662
references: <DrBL7p.BKt@world.std.com> <4nqoll$cpm@neon.house.gov> <4nu2jj$mon@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com> <4nv4l6$b86@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4nviv4$ck5@transfer.stratus.com> <4o13bl$dih@news01.deltanet.com> <4o1n4g$im0@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4o39hn$199@news02.deltanet.com>
organization: Radiks Internet Access
reply-to: reiners@radiks.net
newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.culture.asian.american,alt.christian.religion,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,soc.singles,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.native,rec.org.mensa,soc.culture.african.american,soc.culture.malaysia,talk.origins