Article View: ne.singles
Article #106Re: Men As "Success Objects" & Women As "Sex Objects"
From: Jennifer R Lind
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 00:00
95 lines
5228 bytes
5228 bytes
In <Kimnach.610.0010CC30@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov> Kimnach@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov (Greg L. Kimnach) writes: > >In article <4o0gml$5cu@joni.loop.net> Geryon@yes.its.me.com (Geryon) writes: >>From: Geryon@yes.its.me.com (Geryon) >>Subject: Re: Men As "Success Objects" & Women As "Sex Objects" >>Date: 23 May 1996 01:57:41 GMT > >>In article <4nviv4$ck5@transfer.stratus.com>, fereira@isis.com (John Fereira) says: >>> >>>In article <4nv4l6$b86@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> yng@firefly.prairienet.org (Y Ng) writes: >>>> >>>>Jennifer R Lind (betzl@ix.netcom.com) wrote: > >>>>: As I just said above, owning a house doesn't mean someone is >>>>: responsible, so yes I am changing my view here. There is more to >>>>: responsibilty than saving money though. The proble with the men I went >>>>: out with is that since they never lived on there own they didn't know >>>>: how to take care of themselves. Mother did laundry, bought food, >>>>: cooked, etc. When I get married I'm not going to work full time and >>>>: take care of the house. I already played that game with one guy I >>>>: lived with and I'm not doing it again. >>>>: >>I rent a small house from my betters, but it still somewhat comes to >>the same thing 'living at home'. And much as I hate to admit it, >>I am afraid your right on this one. Although I pretty much run my >>little place as an independent entity now, for a long time 'ol Ma >>and Pa wanted to keep taking care of me like I was a teenager. [I'm >>the youngest in the family-*danger danger danger*] >>This made my own responsibility a bit slow in coming. > >>Usually the old folks wanna keep there last lil' darling around for ever, >>even though the do it subconciously. Always finding reasons why 'junior' >>should stick around. And often these reasons are very *good* reasons, >>at least financially...except junior, already being the youngest and >>not having had to carry quite as responsibility as his/her senior >>siblings, is still kept from learning the full rigors of independent >>life... > > >..and i'll disagree with both of you. yes, i'm still at home, but since my >parents got divorced when i was 12, it was i that did all the cooking and >cleaning (well, my younger sister helped until she moved out). dad would cook >on the weekends usually: a great cook, and i learned from him. but all the >cleaning, yardwork, pool maintainance, etc. were--and are my responsibility. >hell, i've had all the responsibility of a homeowner from a young age! > >even when i "moved in" with a college girlfriend (in quotes because i never >changed my address or even kept a closet full of clothes at her place), i made >sure to go home and get the chores done. > >yep, i guess i'm irresponsible because i'm comin' up on 35, got a masters >degree, have been working for over 8 years, have a sizable savings, and >will have my own place built next year. all according to _my_ plan. > >go figure.......there are no absolutes. each situation is different. > >greg greg, I won't say that your an exception to the rule because I have no idea what the rule is. I can only make decisions based on my past experiences. I went out with 2 guys who lived at home and they were both irresponsible (if you count my brother, that makes three). I also know a guy who has his own house and takes care of it worse than anyone I've ever seen. So, as I said there is no rule here. I'm just wary of living with a man who has never had the responsibility of taking care of himself because I've been burned in the past. In no way do I think this applies to all men. I'm just being cautious. BTW, I have lived on my own but I am currently living with my mother so that I can go back to school. Does this make me irresponsible. I think not. Jen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4p25l9$rav@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DrBL7p.BKt@world.std.com> <4nqoll$cpm@neon.house.gov> <4nu2jj$mon@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com> <4nv4l6$b86@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4nviv4$ck5@transfer.stratus.com> <4o0gml$5cu@joni.loop.net> <Kimnach.610.0010CC30@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ab,32f96041220938f8 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ab,public X-Google-Thread: 1157d8,32f96041220938f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid1157d8,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: 110235,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: fd08c,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gidfd08c,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,5663f04b19d9ba8b X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public From: betzl@ix.netcom.com(Jennifer R Lind ) Subject: Re: Men As "Success Objects" & Women As "Sex Objects" Date: 1996/06/04 Message-ID: <4p25l9$rav@dfw-ixnews6.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 158456299 references: <DrBL7p.BKt@world.std.com> <4nqoll$cpm@neon.house.gov> <4nu2jj$mon@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com> <4nv4l6$b86@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <4nviv4$ck5@transfer.stratus.com> <4o0gml$5cu@joni.loop.net> <Kimnach.610.0010CC30@popserve.lerc.nasa.gov> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Tue Jun 04 3:17:45 PM CDT 1996 newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.culture.asian.american,alt.christian.religion,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,soc.singles,soc.culture.african.american