🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.singles
Article #377

Re: The Dreaded Third Date Rule

#377
From: -=Weezel=-
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
65 lines
4208 bytes
(I've removed alt.personals because this is NOT a personals ad.)

On Thu, 2 May 1996, John Cooley wrote:

> -=Weezel=-  <louise@mv.mv.com> wrote:
> >I personally know women who play the game for men because they KNOW they 
> >will get the financial rewards of doing so. This includes the "response" 
> >this guy's talking about. It also includes "doing it" (I assume he means 
> >having sexual relations) on the first date. They simply do not care in 
> >what manner they access the wallet, or whose wallet it is... And they are 
> >very good actresses. They're very lovey until they either drain the 
> >wallet, find a better one, or get bored. 
> 
> Weezel, plenty of us guys know how much money can be an aphrodisiac; in
> fact we're quite thankful for it.  That is, not all of us can look like
> Sean Connery or Tom Sellick.  It's sort of the oldest known basis of
> male/female human relationships....    I really don't think this really
> is the preferred mode of living & loving; but for a certain segment of
> the male population they're quite grateful this mode exists.
> 
>   - John

Ah yes, John... if there was one part of my posting you'd respond to it 
would be this part. 

My point was "look, if you're getting sex fast, this is one likelihood of
what it is and it's rather worthless - if you wait, if you look for women
who wait, maybe you'll find something else, something where the woman is
not just after your money." (I also mentioned another possibility, but
didn't discuss it as it's not my thing and other women have discussed it.)

YOU took it and said, "yeah, some women are after money, and those of us 
with truely ugly mugs appreciate this fact as it's the only way we can 
get laid." 

(I believe that's a fairly direct translation of what you said...)

My point... maybe it's the only way you can get laid on the first date by
barbie dolls who want big bucks. But you're missing the point. I've dated 
"cute" guys and I've dated guys whose looks would not win any awards. And 
those between. You do not have to be something that looks like it should 
be on television to interest women... nor do you have to buy us.

What I said in the rest of my posting, and in numerous other postings, is
BE A FRIEND. BE A HUMAN. BE PRESENT. It's that attitude you have, that
we're the enemy and/or to be used... really unattractive. Much more so
than most any face you could possibly have. Or even the extra 30 lbs
around your waist. 

IF you're willing to look further than skin deep and to wait until you
have time to explore what is deeper, you just might find a woman who wants
you for YOU, for what is under your skin and in your mind and heart. She
might not have the barbie looks, though. She might not be 28. Or, she
might not want to be wanted simply for her looks, and would say no to sex
on the first date. So you'd write her off, from what I can tell of what
you've written here. 

And so you (and others like you) will continue to buy barbies and gripe
when they turn out to be vampiristic. 

Oh well. I'll go find me a real *human* type guy to talk to. Maybe even
tonight. *grin*

--L
Technical Details
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960502002845.8866D-100000@mv.mv.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4lioqo$pla@news.kincyb.com> <3182780B.7F01@CollegeSherbrooke.qc.ca> <4m1gnq$gl0@tribune.concentric.net> <Pine.BSI.3.91.960430002226.1718A-100000@mv.mv.com> <Dqr8Cu.Kqz@world.std.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110235,17994a2c0807b5c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public
X-Google-Thread: fbd31,17994a2c0807b5c8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public
X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,17994a2c0807b5c8
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,17994a2c0807b5c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,17994a2c0807b5c8
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public
From: -=Weezel=- <louise@mv.mv.com>
Subject: Re: The Dreaded Third Date Rule 
Date: 1996/05/02
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960502002845.8866D-100000@mv.mv.com>
X-Deja-AN: 152534089
x-nntp-posting-host: mv.mv.com
references: <4lioqo$pla@news.kincyb.com> <3182780B.7F01@CollegeSherbrooke.qc.ca> <4m1gnq$gl0@tribune.concentric.net> <Pine.BSI.3.91.960430002226.1718A-100000@mv.mv.com> <Dqr8Cu.Kqz@world.std.com> 
content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
organization: MV Communications, Inc.
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples