🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: ne.singles
Article #383

Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids

#383
From: Valerie
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
27 lines
2385 bytes
cindy@nvg.unit.no (Cindy Kandolf) wrote:

 >If parenthood really were so miserable, every child would be an only
 >child.

Being the parent of an only child, I dislike that attitude.  I hear it a lot.
Whenever I tell anyone that we're not going to have another child, I always
feel the need to add that it isn't because we don't like parenting, or that
he was a difficult child.  It's almost the exact opposite.  We love being
parents, and wish to keep it that way!  And Ryan was such a *good* baby!  He
never had colic, he is extremely intelligent, he is polite, beautiful,
healthy, happy... What more could we want?  We would hate to have another
child that might feel s/he had to live up to his/her big brother's standards.
Of course we would try to make sure that didn't happen, by encouraging
whatever strengths the next child might have, but what if s/he wasn't as
bright, or wasn't as popular, etc... We might feel the need to downplay
Ryan's successes for fear of hurting the second child.  Then *his*
self-esteem might suffer.  There are just too many things that might go
wrong.  Granted they might not, but unless I have that "I'm going to die if I
don't have a child" feeling again, I think it best that we stick with just
one.  Someone will send a message if a second child was meant to be. :-)
 


Valerie
rvr@netrail.net
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4mah7e$9l1@skipper.netrail.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com> <DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com> <4lvo18$uv@verdi.nethelp.no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110235,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public
X-Google-Thread: fbd31,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public
X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public
X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gid106b5d,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public
X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,5c898871827d3f87
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public
From: rvr@netrail.net (Valerie)
Subject: Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids
Date: 1996/05/02
Message-ID: <4mah7e$9l1@skipper.netrail.net>
X-Deja-AN: 152596640
references: <DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com> <DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com> <4lvo18$uv@verdi.nethelp.no>
organization: NetRail, Inc.  Your Gateway to the world!
reply-to: rvr@netrail.net
newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,rec.org.mensa