Article View: ne.singles
Article #383Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids
From: Valerie
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 00:00
27 lines
2385 bytes
2385 bytes
cindy@nvg.unit.no (Cindy Kandolf) wrote: >If parenthood really were so miserable, every child would be an only >child. Being the parent of an only child, I dislike that attitude. I hear it a lot. Whenever I tell anyone that we're not going to have another child, I always feel the need to add that it isn't because we don't like parenting, or that he was a difficult child. It's almost the exact opposite. We love being parents, and wish to keep it that way! And Ryan was such a *good* baby! He never had colic, he is extremely intelligent, he is polite, beautiful, healthy, happy... What more could we want? We would hate to have another child that might feel s/he had to live up to his/her big brother's standards. Of course we would try to make sure that didn't happen, by encouraging whatever strengths the next child might have, but what if s/he wasn't as bright, or wasn't as popular, etc... We might feel the need to downplay Ryan's successes for fear of hurting the second child. Then *his* self-esteem might suffer. There are just too many things that might go wrong. Granted they might not, but unless I have that "I'm going to die if I don't have a child" feeling again, I think it best that we stick with just one. Someone will send a message if a second child was meant to be. :-) Valerie rvr@netrail.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4mah7e$9l1@skipper.netrail.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com> <DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com> <4lvo18$uv@verdi.nethelp.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 110235,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid106b5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public From: rvr@netrail.net (Valerie) Subject: Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids Date: 1996/05/02 Message-ID: <4mah7e$9l1@skipper.netrail.net> X-Deja-AN: 152596640 references: <DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com> <DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com> <4lvo18$uv@verdi.nethelp.no> organization: NetRail, Inc. Your Gateway to the world! reply-to: rvr@netrail.net newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,rec.org.mensa