Article View: ne.singles
Article #456Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids
From: John Cooley
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00
33 lines
2734 bytes
2734 bytes
jcooley@world.std.com (John Cooley) writes: > I just saw on one of those news shows on night TV an interview by Jane Pauly > of Ann Landers. Two of the stats that surprised me was that Ann Landers > said when she asked her readers if they could do it all over again: > > - Only 55% said they would have married their current spouse. > > - 70% said they wouldn't have had kids if they could do it again. Matt Austern <austern@mti.sgi.com> wrote: >Who would you expect to respond to such a question in a newspaper >column: people who are happy with their choices, or people who are >unhappy? I know it wasn't a scientific poll & all, but I felt it was rather surprizing. Judging from all the letters I've read in her column over the years, Ann Landers tends to get more response from middle aged woman more than any other group. (You know: hubby's a drunk & needs help, etc.) And, over the years, I've more than once got to hear from more than one parent about how their kids were the best thing that ever happened to them, again, and again, and again, and again. That's why I was surprized to see this 70% figure. Then I realized that it could be that most parents would never want to admit publically that they wished they hadn't have had kids. It sort of reflects poorly on them and is bound to draw some suspicious looks... - John ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- __)) "Glass ceilings? Name ANY ex-goat farmer who's made management!" /_ oo (_ \ Holliston Poor Farm - John Cooley %// \" Holliston, MA 01746-6222 part time Sheep & ex-Goat Farmer %%% $ jcooley@world.std.com full time contract ASIC & FPGA Designer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: 110235,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: 106b5d,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid106b5d,public X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,5c898871827d3f87 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public From: jcooley@world.std.com (John Cooley) Subject: Re: 70% Said, Given A Second Chance, They Wouldn't Have Had Kids Date: 1996/04/25 Message-ID: <DqFq3z.BDB@world.std.com> X-Deja-AN: 151430506 references: <DqCMDn.HwD@world.std.com> <AUSTERN.96Apr23220638@tristan.mti.sgi.com> organization: The E-mail Synopsys Users Group (ESNUG) newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples,rec.org.mensa