Article View: ne.singles
Article #504Re: The singles scene-does it have to be so confusing?
From: Anil
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 1996 00:00
38 lines
3117 bytes
3117 bytes
Okay! May be polygamy makes sense. Better yet! Polygamy may be the answer for the next millenium. Why...? Because, most people who are pro-monogamy are the creators of multitude of hungry mouths. The polygamists (you won't find it in a dict.) will not do that (barring few exceptional cases like Idi Amin). Or just imagine, an army of children marching through malls, movie-theatres, and restaurants. In article <4l4hvf$eid@nuhou.aloha.net>, George <smooth@aloha.net> writes: |> < You've got half an answer: it's not enough to see that the church |> imposed monogomy; you have ask why there were so many polygamous |> marriages in the first place. > |> |> Because it is just more fun ? :-) Perhaps it even makes more sense, financially ? (It costs less to buy |> anything if 10 people team up ? Or that 8 - 10 breadwinners in a family insure a higher financial safety |> for the offsprings than only 2 ? ) |> |> < Remember: just because it was done in the past doesn't make it right. > |> |> Just because it (monogamy) is done now, it doesn't make it right any more either...it can be as well just |> a passing flavor or the millenium, how can you tell ? Because the Church says ? Ho ho ho. I wouldn't |> trust them with a chocolate cake, let alone my sex life :-) |> |> < In today's society with all the STD's floating around, [polygamy] makes even less sense. > |> |> Basketball makes even less sense, and you can't even imagine how popular it is :-) |> The only way to keep all STDs away from you is to live your life behind a closed door. |> While my houseplants don't complain, I think I would find that a _leeetle_ boring. |> |> < Lastly, your argument is specious: just because *you* say you aren't a pervert doesn't mean you |> *aren't* a pervert. > |> |> If calling me a pervert makes you happy, call me a pervert. Anything to make you happy Just don't ask |> for money, I'm sentimentally too attached to it... :-) |> ( Why did I have a pressentiment that if someone flames me, it will be another male ? ) |> |> George |> |>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4l939q$5ok@progress.bedford.progress.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4koibm$6iv@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <Dpt8t1.E8J@mv.mv.com> <4ks032$cdi@news.tiac.net> <4kvf6u$s4q@nuhou.aloha.net> <Dpz4Lt.zs@world.std.com> <4l4hvf$eid@nuhou.aloha.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdc4a,2497abe156089177 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc4a,public X-Google-Thread: 1082f5,2497abe156089177 X-Google-Attributes: gid1082f5,public X-Google-Thread: 110235,2497abe156089177 X-Google-Attributes: gid110235,public X-Google-Thread: fbd31,2497abe156089177 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbd31,public X-Google-Thread: 10a1d2,637212e344066c6e X-Google-Attributes: gid10a1d2,public From: anilv@bedford.progress.com (Anil) Subject: Re: The singles scene-does it have to be so confusing? Date: 1996/04/19 Message-ID: <4l939q$5ok@progress.bedford.progress.com> X-Deja-AN: 150413049 sender: anilv@kiska (Anil) references: <4koibm$6iv@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <Dpt8t1.E8J@mv.mv.com> <4ks032$cdi@news.tiac.net> <4kvf6u$s4q@nuhou.aloha.net> <Dpz4Lt.zs@world.std.com> <4l4hvf$eid@nuhou.aloha.net> organization: Progress Software Corporation reply-to: anilv@bedford.progress.com newsgroups: ne.singles,soc.women,soc.men,ba.singles,soc.couples