🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4kl177$buf@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, bogbody@aol.com (Bogbody) wrote:

> I> Of course, this completely grates against the
> let's-spend-months-getting-
> |> to-know-each-other-before-even-kissing style many women would like to
> |> follow if they got their druthers in the dating world.
> |> 
> |> What results most of the time is something in between these two
> approaches.
> |> 
> |>   - John
> 
> John, I know you said "many" women, not "all" or even "most," but I'm
> going to disagree with you anyway. Women have sex urges. We really do. We
> want to get laid. We want to have hot, nasty sex. We just want to like the
> guy we're doing it with (usually!;-) ) I certainly wouldn't wait months!
> In fact, if a guy didn't try at a fairly early date, the woman would
> probably get a little concerned! Hell, she probably wouldn't notice
> because she would have jumped *his* bones on the third or fourth date!
> I've heard of this "third date rule" myself. I've never been burnt on it,
> myself, because I usually know by the second or third date if I want to
> try sex. Hell, maybe *I* want to know if he's "worth it!" (Sponge-worthy?
> ;-) )
> -katy

Katy,

Finally! Someone's hit the nail on the head. Holding sex above someone's
head as a carnal carrot that's just out of reach, makes little more sense
than jumping someone's bones at first glance. If the time is right between
any two people, it'll happen--being arbitrary about timing does little
good (except perhaps for entertainment value, in a certain twisted way).

Cheers

-- 
BWB
_______________________
"Impatience is Virtual"