🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <DpLwDt.E5B@world.std.com>,
John Cooley <jcooley@world.std.com> wrote:
>-=Weezel=-  <louise@mv.mv.com> wrote:
>>I do pottery up at the Manchester Institute of Art (NH) and most of the 
>>classes are 100% women. I think you'd find that in most art classes. Even 
>>photography has more women than men. And pottery, especially, requires NO 
>>artistic skill if you're a beginner. Just the ability to like getting 
>>really messy. And heck, it's one way to find out if the woman's too 
>>prudish to get messy. *grin*
>
>
>From a hunting-for-a-perspective-mate point of view, some of these
>take-a-class activities can be a collossal time investment for very 
>little return unless they're focused singles events.  (I used to give
>that same pat answer of "take a class" to my friends looking for a
>significant other until they reported back how dismal these courses
>were numbers-wise.  For example, a pottery class may contain 12 people
>of which: 2 are guys, 3 are children, 4 are senior citizens, 2 are
>married women -- leaving one possible "elligible" female.)  My angry
>buddy told me: "I would have met more women watching female mud
>wrestling in a seedy bar in Las Vegas before I found a good one in
>that damn pottery class you told me to take!"

To whit, it would appear wisest to take a class that is interesting and
enjoyable in its own right.  That way, time isn't wasted and the event of 
meeting possible significant others is merely an added fillip to time
well spent.  

But what do I know?  I'm getting to the point where I actually enjoy
being single.  ;)

Yours,

Arlyn
--
Arlyn J. Hubbell                   webmaster@shore.net; arlyn@shore.net
Shore.Net			 http://www.shore.net/~arlyn/arlyn.html

"Some mornings it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps."