🚀 go-pugleaf

=v= Carl Rogers has certainly presented an unexpected quirk
here, but I'm still not so sure it passes the Turing Test.
    <_Jym_>

On Aug 19, 7:28 pm, Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org> wrote:
> =v= Carl Rogers has certainly presented an unexpected quirk
> here, but I'm still not so sure it passes the Turing Test.
>     <_Jym_>

psssst...OSTT.  Thanks.

On Aug 19, 8:57 pm, MLOM <gr...@netzero.net> wrote:
> On Aug 19, 7:28 pm, Jym Dyer <j...@econet.org> wrote:
>
> > =v= Carl Rogers has certainly presented an unexpected quirk
> > here, but I'm still not so sure it passes the Turing Test.
> >     <_Jym_>
>
> psssst...OSTT.  Thanks.

Those from other newsgroups besides MTR are not going to know what
OSTT is.

Froggie

On Aug 19, 8:08 pm, Carl Rogers <postmas...@wwtl.info> wrote:
> Hi Viatologists,
>
> As you continue your scientific studies of roadways, please take a
> moment to realise how your carbon footprint affects the environment!
> Carbon densifies the ozone layer and traps heat.  Consider going above
> and beyond the scientific principles of viatology by additionally
> keeping YOUR studies green.  With your help, you can help save the
> planet.  For a list of recommended guidelines in "green" for viatology-
> based research, please refer to this article:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/92hv4h
>
> Of importance:
>
> (1)  Don't take road trips purely for the sake of roads!!!  Bundle it
> into a
> vacation and kill two birds w/one stone.
> (2)  If viatologists wish to discuss their topic w/ one another, use
> alternative communication mediums like teleconferencing, telephone,
> or
> physically meeting together for more than a Saturday/Sunday gig
> that's
> several hundred kilometres away.  If you're traveling that kind of
> distance
> for that short of a meet, your lack of a social life is deprecating to
> Earth
> and is a carbon pollutant.
> (3)  If you must travel for the sake of viatology alone, consider a
> fuel-efficient car that gets more than 30 MPG or 7.75L/100km.
> (4)  Carpool w/ other viatologists when all possible.
>
> To reiterate -- getting to your destination of roadside research
> produces carbon emission.  It doesn't matter whether you travel by
> car, rail, or airplane.  Do your part and determine what method suits
> the environment.
>
> The WWTL officially endorses a green advertising-partner called 'Trip
> Footprint', who uncoincidentally offers you the ability to compute
> your footprint based on your mode of transportation AND the number of
> people involved in your travel party:  http://www.tripfootprint.com.
> Consider a visit today.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carl Rogers
> "Environment first, transportology second"
> ********
> Worldwide Transportation Library (WWTL):http://wwtl.info
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Complete coverage of international roads and railways.
> Since 2000, we have offered several photographs, videos and
> Virtual 360 captures -- to each viatologist & transportologist.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ********

Society will receive a significant upgrade when you stop converting
oxygen into carbon dioxide.

On Aug 19, 7:08 pm, Carl Rogers <postmas...@wwtl.info> wrote:
> Hi Viatologists,
>
> As you continue your scientific studies of roadways, please take a
> moment to realise how your carbon footprint affects the environment!
> Carbon densifies the ozone layer and traps heat.  Consider going above
> and beyond the scientific principles of viatology by additionally
> keeping YOUR studies green.  With your help, you can help save the
> planet.  For a list of recommended guidelines in "green" for viatology-
> based research, please refer to this article:

Too bad you're all about brown viatology... what with your sticking
your meatpole in random tranny hookers' "federal routes" and all that.

> To reiterate -- getting to your destination of roadside research
> produces carbon emission.

It can't be worse than your emissions, which smell like a deadly
combination of horse semen and Taco Bell.

> The WWTL officially endorses a green advertising-partner called 'Trip
> Footprint', who uncoincidentally offers you the ability to compute
> your footprint based on your mode of transportation AND the number of
> people involved in your travel party:  http://www.tripfootprint.com.
> Consider a visit today.

For once I agree with Karl, but only because it's a legitimate website
and not the Worldwide Tongue-in-Anus Library.

On Aug 19, 8:08 pm, Carl Rogers <postmas...@wwtl.info> wrote:
> Hi Viatologists,
>
> As you continue your scientific studies of roadways, please take a
> moment to realise how your carbon footprint affects the environment!
> Carbon densifies the ozone layer and traps heat.  Consider going above
> and beyond the scientific principles of viatology by additionally
> keeping YOUR studies green.  With your help, you can help save the
> planet.  For a list of recommended guidelines in "green" for viatology-
> based research, please refer to this article:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/92hv4h
>
> Of importance:
>
> (1)  Don't take road trips purely for the sake of roads!!!  Bundle it
> into a
> vacation and kill two birds w/one stone.
> (2)  If viatologists wish to discuss their topic w/ one another, use
> alternative communication mediums like teleconferencing, telephone,
> or
> physically meeting together for more than a Saturday/Sunday gig
> that's
> several hundred kilometres away.  If you're traveling that kind of
> distance
> for that short of a meet, your lack of a social life is deprecating to
> Earth
> and is a carbon pollutant.
> (3)  If you must travel for the sake of viatology alone, consider a
> fuel-efficient car that gets more than 30 MPG or 7.75L/100km.
> (4)  Carpool w/ other viatologists when all possible.
>
> To reiterate -- getting to your destination of roadside research
> produces carbon emission.  It doesn't matter whether you travel by
> car, rail, or airplane.  Do your part and determine what method suits
> the environment.
>
> The WWTL officially endorses a green advertising-partner called 'Trip
> Footprint', who uncoincidentally offers you the ability to compute
> your footprint based on your mode of transportation AND the number of
> people involved in your travel party:  http://www.tripfootprint.com.
> Consider a visit today.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Carl Rogers

Please stop cross-posting anything to ne.transportation that is not
specifically about transportation in New England.

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:43:29 -0700 (PDT), Pete <masspete@my-deja.com>
wrote:

<< snip calrog crap >>

>Please stop cross-posting anything to ne.transportation that is not
>specifically about transportation in New England.

Please observe OSTT. Thanks. 

--
necromancer - ECHM

On 8/22/2009 8:49 AM necromancer spake thus:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:43:29 -0700 (PDT), Pete <masspete@my-deja.com>
> wrote:
> 
> << snip calrog crap >>
> 
>>Please stop cross-posting anything to ne.transportation that is not
>>specifically about transportation in New England.
> 
> Please observe OSTT. Thanks. 

OSTT: Ohev Shalom Talmud Torah? Off-shore tanker terminal? 
Organizational systems technology training? Open systems technology 
transfer? What?


-- 
Found--the gene that causes belief in genetic determinism

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:38:14 -0700, David Nebenzahl
<nobody@but.us.chickens> wrote:

>On 8/22/2009 8:49 AM necromancer spake thus:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:43:29 -0700 (PDT), Pete <masspete@my-deja.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> << snip calrog crap >>
>> 
>>>Please stop cross-posting anything to ne.transportation that is not
>>>specifically about transportation in New England.
>> 
>> Please observe OSTT. Thanks. 
>
>OSTT: Ohev Shalom Talmud Torah? Off-shore tanker terminal? 
>Organizational systems technology training? Open systems technology 
>transfer? What?

Operation Starve The Troll. In other words, don't reply to anything
that carl spams to the newsgroups to deprive him of the attention he
craves.

AC

Carl Rogers wrote:
> As you continue your scientific studies of roadways, please take a
> moment to realise how your carbon footprint affects the environment!

Carl, if I still cared about your ho-hum site, I would quit now because
you're parroting the "green" movement, which is about hating human beings.

Ask not how big your footprint is on the environment.  Ask how much the
environment demands of YOU -- and if it's too much, then smash it.

Humans don't exist to protect the Earth.  The Earth exists to sustain
human beings.  Comfortably.