🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

25 total messages Started by Loose Cannon Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:55
Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1192
Author: Loose Cannon
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 04:55
6 lines
1551 bytes
Why must poor Michael be so vilified because he was being kind to a
child.Sleeping in the same bed is not a crime. Michael is a married
man with 3 children of his own. I think it's racism.Please! write to
your local newspaper and tell them that you believe Michael Jackson is
just a misunderstood man, who is completely innocent. Thankyou.       
 LC
none
#1193
Author: Christy
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:12
15 lines
2197 bytes
0y3fX+7UdREXNiNF4Gb05grE4�
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.

In article <5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com>
plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:
>
> Why must poor Michael be so vilified because he was being kind to a
> child.Sleeping in the same bed is not a crime. Michael is a married
> man with 3 children of his own. I think it's racism.Please! write to
> your local newspaper and tell them that you believe Michael Jackson is
> just a misunderstood man, who is completely innocent. Thankyou.
>  LC


Get a clue, fukkhead.
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1194
Author: Chris
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:03
11 lines
2037 bytes
your name says it all


"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
> Why must poor Michael be so vilified because he was being kind to a
> child.Sleeping in the same bed is not a crime. Michael is a married
> man with 3 children of his own. I think it's racism.Please! write to
> your local newspaper and tell them that you believe Michael Jackson is
> just a misunderstood man, who is completely innocent. Thankyou.
>  LC
Re:Bradburyblubber is guilty
#1196
Author: Ken McVay, OBC
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:32
108 lines
6158 bytes
"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...

Why must you be afraid of Patrick Humphry, Tubbylard? Does he scare widdle
bradblubber?

All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas:

http://www.mailgate.org.uk/uk/uk.local.yorkshire/msg136332.html
http://www.einsatzgruppenarchive.com/bradbury.wav
http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott/

Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:

Scott Bradbury
13 N Mechanic Street
Bellville, Texas, 77418
979-865-9711


The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:

                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

[Full court document available here:
http://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01]

      25. Since the filing of this lawsuit Defendant Scott Bradbury
increased his efforts to harass and threaten Plaintiff and to distribute
false and defamatory information about him in an effort to intimidate
Plaintiff.

      26. Defendant has been assisted in this effort by David E. Michael
and Donald Ellis publishing material either under their own names,
pseudonyms, or anonymously.

      27. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by
"mailbombing" him by sending gigantic files to him as electronic
communications.

      28. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by asking
various commercial services to send him electronic communications thereby
overwhelming his service provider with "spam."

      29. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt the internet service of others by send
them "mailbombs" in Plaintiff's name and using Plaintiff's name to spam
such persons.

      30. On or about July 2, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates acting  then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published personal information about Plaintiff's family including his
father, mother, sister and brother including their names addresses,
telephone numbers with instructions to call and harass them.  Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as "Exhibit "A."

      31. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him and his family.

      32. Said purpose  was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.

      33. On or about July 7, 2000,  Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates a ting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published four threats of violence against Defendant Scott Bradbury.  One
such publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B."

      34. The purpose of such forgeries was to harass Plaintiff with false
charges.

      35. Notwithstanding that he was aware said publications were
forgeries, Defendant Scott Bradbury forwarded copies of said publications
to Plaintiff's internet provider claiming that Plaintiff had published said
material.

      36. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to the law firm of Todd S. Miller & Associates
notwithstanding the fact that said publications were known to him to be
forgeries.

      37. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff.

      38. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.

      39. Said publication was made with the consent, approval, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.

      40. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to Plaintiff's internet service provider and to various
law enforcement agencies notwithstanding the fact that said publications
were known to him to be forgeries
All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas
#1195
Author: Ken McVay, OBC
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:33
106 lines
6278 bytes
"Chris" <dosequixxs@aol.com> wrote in message
news:RAS4c.23283$Sp2.7459258@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> your name says it all

All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas:

http://www.mailgate.org.uk/uk/uk.local.yorkshire/msg136332.html
http://www.einsatzgruppenarchive.com/bradbury.wav
http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/bradbury-scott/

Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:

Scott Bradbury
13 N Mechanic Street
Bellville, Texas, 77418
979-865-9711


The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:

                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

[Full court document available here:
http://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01]

      25. Since the filing of this lawsuit Defendant Scott Bradbury
increased his efforts to harass and threaten Plaintiff and to distribute
false and defamatory information about him in an effort to intimidate
Plaintiff.

      26. Defendant has been assisted in this effort by David E. Michael
and Donald Ellis publishing material either under their own names,
pseudonyms, or anonymously.

      27. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by
"mailbombing" him by sending gigantic files to him as electronic
communications.

      28. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by asking
various commercial services to send him electronic communications thereby
overwhelming his service provider with "spam."

      29. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt the internet service of others by send
them "mailbombs" in Plaintiff's name and using Plaintiff's name to spam
such persons.

      30. On or about July 2, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates acting  then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published personal information about Plaintiff's family including his
father, mother, sister and brother including their names addresses,
telephone numbers with instructions to call and harass them.  Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as "Exhibit "A."

      31. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him and his family.

      32. Said purpose  was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.

      33. On or about July 7, 2000,  Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates a ting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published four threats of violence against Defendant Scott Bradbury.  One
such publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B."

      34. The purpose of such forgeries was to harass Plaintiff with false
charges.

      35. Notwithstanding that he was aware said publications were
forgeries, Defendant Scott Bradbury forwarded copies of said publications
to Plaintiff's internet provider claiming that Plaintiff had published said
material.

      36. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to the law firm of Todd S. Miller & Associates
notwithstanding the fact that said publications were known to him to be
forgeries.

      37. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff.

      38. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.

      39. Said publication was made with the consent, approval, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.

      40. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to Plaintiff's internet service provider and to various
law enforcement agencies notwithstanding the fact that said publications
were known to him to be forgeries
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1197
Author: charlie dick
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:04
14 lines
1859 bytes
In alt.appalachian, plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:

>Why ...?

I know yew, and yer bait steenks, cross-posting trollboy.


-- 
charlie dick

"The right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive 
of rights, and the right most valued by a free people." 

    - Justice Louis Brandeis, Olmstead v. U.S. (1928).
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1198
Author: Joebruno
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:34
19 lines
1909 bytes
plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote in message news:<5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com>...
> Why must poor Michael be so vilified because he was being kind to a
> child.Sleeping in the same bed is not a crime. Michael is a married
> man with 3 children of his own.

Have you ever heard the word "bisexual"?


 I think it's racism.

No,it isn't. I have Black friends and I still detest pedophiles.


Please! write to
> your local newspaper and tell them that you believe Michael Jackson is
> just a misunderstood man, who is completely innocent. Thankyou.       
>  LC

I think Michael Jackson is an ugly freak who belongs in a circus sideshow.
Re: Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1199
Author: MyTwoAngels
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:25
19 lines
2593 bytes
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 06:03:29 GMT, "Chris" <dosequixxs@aol.com> wrote:

>your name says it all

Well, the idiot who's posting with an alias combined of the names of
people who've effortlessly shamed this idiot is a "losse cannon."
(And should be ignored.)

>
>
>"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
>> Why must poor Michael be so vilified because he was being kind to a
>> child.Sleeping in the same bed is not a crime. Michael is a married
>> man with 3 children of his own. I think it's racism.Please! write to
>> your local newspaper and tell them that you believe Michael Jackson is
>> just a misunderstood man, who is completely innocent. Thankyou.
>>  LC
>
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1200
Author: William Daffer
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:39
17 lines
2249 bytes
charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> writes:

> In alt.appalachian, plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:
>
>>Why ...?
>
> I know yew, and yer bait steenks, cross-posting trollboy.

[newsgroups set]

whd
-- 
Ross, on the meaning of his response in 
<20010802014157.12518.00002213@ng-fq1.aol.com>

  Message-ID: <20010802191550.00840.00002241@ng-cl1.aol.com>
  ROTFL.... It takes a jew with a University degree to detect an obvious farce.
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1201
Author: William Daffer
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:39
15 lines
2234 bytes
MyTwoAngels <krisblakemy2babies@xmsg.com> writes:

[newsgroups set]
whd
-- 
Morghus, in 73fedc95.0108161718.6bd60250@posting.google.com, says:

The bogus farm-house chambers were also supposed to be able to
accomodate 2,000 people each.  That's where the interrogators dreamed
up their peak capacity of 10,000 in 1941 at the farmhouses.


http://groups.google.com/groups?as_ugroup=alt.revisionism&as_umsgid=73fedc95.0108161718.6bd60250%40posting.google.com

for the complete post.
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1202
Author: charlie dick
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:31
23 lines
2128 bytes
In alt.appalachian, William Daffer <whdaffer@wabcmail.com> wrote:

>charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> writes:
>
>> In alt.appalachian, plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:
>>
>>>Why ...?
>>
>> I know yew, and yer bait steenks, cross-posting trollboy.
>
>[newsgroups set]
>
>whd
[newsgroups expanded]

hth hand!
-- 
charlie dick

"The right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive 
of rights, and the right most valued by a free people." 

    - Justice Louis Brandeis, Olmstead v. U.S. (1928).
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1203
Author: Kurt Knoll
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:49
17 lines
2230 bytes
<ellis@no.spam> wrote in message
news:1079242837.802043@localhost.localdomain...
> In article <5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com>,
> Loose Cannon <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Why must poor Michael be so vilified
>
> Because he molested children, moron.
>
Is there any proof you moron. What could be child molesting in the
states in not in Europe. There are not even Guidelines for it any
Religious Fanatic group has their own Agenda and who wants to listen to
this Hallelujah Gagster anyway.

Kurt Knoll.
=
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1204
Author: The Ice Cream Bandit
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:33
21 lines
1882 bytes
Kurt Knoll wrote:

> <ellis@no.spam> wrote in message
> news:1079242837.802043@localhost.localdomain...
> 
>>In article <5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com>,
>>Loose Cannon <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Why must poor Michael be so vilified
>>
>>Because he molested children, moron.
>>
> 
> Is there any proof you moron. What could be child molesting in the
> states in not in Europe.

Talk to Ian Huntley in the UK and that evil freak in Belgium about that, 
buttsniff.

> 
Re: All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas
#1205
Author: Alley
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:49
13 lines
2116 bytes
In article <c315bo0d39@enews4.newsguy.com>
"Ken McVay, OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> wrote:
>
>
> "Chris" <dosequixxs@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:RAS4c.23283$Sp2.7459258@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> > your name says it all
>
> All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas:
>
>

Yawn.
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1206
Author: Kurt Knoll
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:01
33 lines
2621 bytes
"The Ice Cream Bandit" <fruzengladje@haagend.asz> wrote in message
news:c328ht$kn1$2@pita.alt.net...
> Kurt Knoll wrote:
>
> > <ellis@no.spam> wrote in message
> > news:1079242837.802043@localhost.localdomain...
> >
> >>In article <5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com>,
> >>Loose Cannon <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Why must poor Michael be so vilified
> >>
> >>Because he molested children, moron.
> >>
> >
> > Is there any proof you moron. What could be child molesting in the
> > states in not in Europe.
>
> Talk to Ian Huntley in the UK and that evil freak in Belgium about
that,
> buttsniff.
>
> >
>

Well guy in America if one walks accidentally naked in front of a Child
it is child abuse. In a case like this in America when some one is Rich
it is they way to make money out of it.

Kurt Knoll.
=
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1207
Author: Cujo DeSockpuppet
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:19
40 lines
3538 bytes
charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> wrote in news:c321g4$p5c$1
@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:

> In alt.appalachian, William Daffer <whdaffer@wabcmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> writes:
>>
>>> In alt.appalachian, plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why ...?
>>>
>>> I know yew, and yer bait steenks, cross-posting trollboy.
>>
>>[newsgroups set]
>>
>>whd
> [newsgroups expanded]
> 
> hth hand!

It's bad enough there's netkkkops on alt.* froups but a nest of inbred 
assholes like alt.appalacian is just too funny. 

I'll welcome them to the wide world of AA anyway.

VOOP! VOOP!

Cave in at the coal mine!

That ought to make them feel right at home when they aren't fucking their 
sisters or the wildlife.

-- 
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the 8/2000 & 2/2003 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
Colonel of the Fanatic Legion. FL# 555-PLNTY Motto: ABUNDANCE!.
Official TruKook(tm) as certified by Ed Wollmann. Meow.
"what do you think I am, REALLY stupid?" - Ed asking yet another 
question with an obvious answer.
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1208
Author: charlie dick
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 23:55
58 lines
3269 bytes
In alt.appalachian, Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote:

>charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> wrote in news:c321g4$p5c$1
>@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>> In alt.appalachian, William Daffer <whdaffer@wabcmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>charlie dick <dick@databasix.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> In alt.appalachian, plhumphrey1@hotmail.com (Loose Cannon) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Why ...?
>>>>
>>>> I know yew, and yer bait steenks, cross-posting trollboy.
>>>
>>>[newsgroups set]
>>>
>>>whd
>> [newsgroups expanded]
>> 
>> hth hand!
>
>It's bad enough there's netkkkops on alt.* froups but a nest of inbred 
>assholes like alt.appalacian is just too funny. 

Inbred?  A thousand pardons...  The breeding practiced in these hills is
quite selective.  Just ask your mama/sister/wife...

>I'll welcome them to the wide world of AA anyway.

AA welcomes aa.  Cute. Are you serving the same piss-soaked bread the
regular hunchbacks...err...astrologers over there relish, or are you just
cheerful 'cause y'all gave it up for Lent?

>VOOP! VOOP!
>
>Cave in at the coal mine!

And you're gonna change your name from Cujo to Tweety Bird, right?  Sing
for me, canaryboy.

>That ought to make them feel right at home when they aren't fucking their 
>sisters or the wildlife.

Or you.

Oh yeah... [groups expanded]

hth hand!


-- 
charlie dick

"The right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive 
of rights, and the right most valued by a free people." 

    - Justice Louis Brandeis, Olmstead v. U.S. (1928).
Re: Bradburyblubber is guilty
#1184
Author: Fred Ziffel
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:29
288 lines
15701 bytes
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:32:47 -0800, <c315ak0d2c@enews4.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:

>"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
>
>Why must you be afraid of Patrick Humphry, Tubbylard? Does he scare widdle
>bradblubber?

Now you shits have gone from claiming I harass people and intimidate them to now
claimintg I am intimidated by the same lot of losers who once complained I
intimidated them and for which I was even sued!!

BTW how am I guilty when the lawsuit against me was DISMISSED?

You aren't being very nice Kenneth McVay and what you are doing reflects more on
you than it does me! You and your NIZKOR web site are losing credibility as your
lies and your dirty tactics are becoming even wider known by more and more
people. You are supposed to be an honest person engaging in Holocaust Research
BUT you are nothing but a smear agent who attempts to violate people's rights to
privacy in order to attempt to intimidate them into silence when you don't agree
with their views!

>http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/<smear link deleted>

I thought you didn't keep files on private citizens!!

>Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:
>
>Scott Bradbury

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461 
1-417-781-3282 
wpgold@kenmcvay.com
kmcvay@nizkor.org
KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 
Residential address:
Ken McVay
995 Bowen Road  Apt. 3108
Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada

    Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where 
     the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
 "Sara Salzman of Aurora, Colorado" 
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit2001/audit2001-03.html
(Archived locally as: BBsmearsME)
2001 Audit of Antisemitic Incidents
<Public Information>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
  Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: 
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured. 
http://maps.infospace.com/home/kevmap?OP=GeoCode&OTMPL=kevmap2/mapresults.htm&qa=918+N+Bayard+St&qc=Allentown&qs=pa&ver=14132
(Archived locally as: 918N_Bayard)
 Yale F. Edeiken
 918 N Bayard St
 Allentown PA 18104
 Tel 610 435-9820
<Source: Court documents>
  If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out then he
should encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!

>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:
>
>                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me   V1.1  S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT  EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2n02ehj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> wrote:

>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:

ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place! 

>                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!

Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
  "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
  "July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
  "August 25, 2000: PRAE TO ENTER JDGT AFGAINST DFT SCOTT BRADBURY AKA DOC
TAVISH FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND. JDGT ENTERED VS/SAID DFT IN AN AMT TO BE
ASSESSEED. IMPORTANT NOTICE, AFDT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. NOTICE MLD
8/25/2000 FILED @ 9:28 AM."
  I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on me by a Sheriff's Deputy nor on my attorney who is on record with
the court as stating:
  Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
 COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
   On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
   Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."  
         
                 Respectfully submitted
                 Daylin B. Leach Esquire

<END>

How could I answer perjurious complaints when neither I NOR my attorney were
never legally served the complaints by Shyster Yale F. Edeiken. But Ken McVay
knows that and he posts the lawsuit which was dismissed against me to smear me.
Ken McVay, the Director of the Nizkor Project, is not much on honesty!

>[Full court document available here:
>http://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/<smear link munged>/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01

Hey Ken McVay haven't you learned yet? That lawsuit and its judgment against me
were DISMISSED way back in early 2001. Yale F. Edeiken lost and Yale F. Edeiken
has been publicly censured by the Supreme Court of his state (but not for his
lawsuit against me) which facts you don't want known but here they are:

        Shyster Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F. 
^^^^^^^  ^^^^ ^ 
              Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID    Case    County  District  
40290       122 DB 95  Lehigh     II   Public Censure Administered 10/20/98 
            ^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>

A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above 
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
                                                   ^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)

The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of his state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with: "It is
further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E."  IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!! 

BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1  S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT


						Tavish

	   ~~Famous Last Words from Jail Bird Ken McVay~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=c1dhpk01lqh@enews4.newsguy.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: McVayCarThief_1 AND McVayCarThief_2)
From: "Ken McVay, OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org>
Newsgroups: edm.general,edm.politics,ab.general,can.taxes
Subject: Re: Bracegirdles Both Deserve Jail,Also Auditors-Crown Appeals
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:46:13 -0800
Organization: The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org

"Ken McVay, OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> did write:

>It seems Bill Grosvenor is still afraid to publish under his own name.
>That's because he has no evidence that I have ever been arrested, let alone
>convicted, of any crime, 

Is that so? Did this Jewish web site lie when it reported this?

http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/Publications.asp?did=135&pid=21
(Link active February 11, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay)
Also:  http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/PublicationsPrint.asp?did=135
(Link active February 23, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay2)

The American Jewish Committee

"Hate and the Internet by Kenneth S. Stern
  On-Line Approaches
"My whole agenda is to try and remove their market, as it were. They have an
agenda to sell. If, by demonstrating that they are lying about a specific issue,
I can remove a few hundred people from their potential market place, then I�ve
done them some harm." � Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father�s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail.... <END>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooops looks like you have been caught lying again McVay! The "American Jewish
Committee" reported: "Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father�s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail" YET you stated above: "he has no evidence that I
have ever been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime"!
       Isn't being  "Apprehended" the same thing as being "arrested"? 
WordNet 2.0 Vocabulary Helper: apprehended
The verb apprehend has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts)
1. (2) get the picture, comprehend, savvy, dig, grasp, compass, apprehend -- get
the meaning of something; ``Do you comprehend the meaning of this letter?''  
2. (1) collar, nail, apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody;
``the police nabbed the suspected criminals'' ) 
3. apprehend, quail at -- (anticipate with dread or anxiety) 
-----
Which sense of "apprehended" applies to you Ken McVay? ANSWER: "collar, nail,
apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody; ``the police 
nabbed the suspected criminals'' ) 

YOU NOW HAVE A POLICE RECORD TOO KEN! Care to deny it Jail Bird McVay? 
Here's laughing at you!! You did state: "he has no evidence that I have ever
been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime.." BUT you were apprehended
or arrested for the crime of car theft and you were jailed! Once again you are
exposed as a liar! You weren't convicted because charges evidently weren't
pressed by your father!

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461 
1-417-781-3282 
wpgold@kenmcvay.com
kmcvay@nizkor.org
KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 



_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
               <><><><><><><>   The Worlds Uncensored News Source   <><><><><><><><>
  
Re: All you need to know about Scott Bradbury, of Bellville, Texas
#1185
Author: Fred Ziffel
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 05:30
276 lines
15326 bytes
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:33:23 -0800, <c315bo0d39@enews4.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:

You aren't being very nice Kenneth McVay and what you are doing reflects more on
you than it does me! You and your NIZKOR web site are losing credibility as your
lies and your dirty tactics are becoming even wider known by more and more
people. You are supposed to be an honest person engaging in Holocaust Research
BUT you are nothing but a smear agent who attempts to violate people's rights to
privacy in order to attempt to intimidate them into silence when you don't agree
with their views!

>http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/<smear link deleted>

I thought you didn't keep files on private citizens!!

>Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:
>
>Scott Bradbury

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461 
1-417-781-3282 
wpgold@kenmcvay.com
kmcvay@nizkor.org
KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 
Residential address:
Ken McVay
995 Bowen Road  Apt. 3108
Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada

    Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post where 
     the people live who made such info public in the first place!
Sara Salzman
 "Sara Salzman of Aurora, Colorado" 
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit2001/audit2001-03.html
(Archived locally as: BBsmearsME)
2001 Audit of Antisemitic Incidents
<Public Information>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  I am being harassed by having my confidential information being posted along
with death threats, forged child porn ads being posted which give out my address
etc., having phoney sex offender lists posted which give out my address, having
magazine and catalog subscriptions forged in my identity etc. FOR A FACT it was
Yale F. Edeiken and Yale F. Edeiken alone who subpoenaed my confidential info
from my ISP and made the subpoenaed info public-- now let him receive justice
under the Law of Moses:
  Just as has been done to me and is still being done to me and solely because
of Yale F. Edeiken exclusively I will apply the LAW he claims to observe to him:
Leviticus 24:19-20 :: New International Version (NIV)
19 If anyone injures his neighbor, whatever he has done must be done to him: 
20 fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. As he has injured the
other, so he is to be injured. 
http://maps.infospace.com/home/kevmap?OP=GeoCode&OTMPL=kevmap2/mapresults.htm&qa=918+N+Bayard+St&qc=Allentown&qs=pa&ver=14132
(Archived locally as: 918N_Bayard)
 Yale F. Edeiken
 918 N Bayard St
 Allentown PA 18104
 Tel 610 435-9820
<Source: Court documents>
  If Yale does not like getting back in kind what he has dished out then he
should encourage his THUG allies to stop harassing me and invading my privacy!

>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:
>
>                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me   V1.1  S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT  EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2n02ehj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> wrote:

>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:

ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place! 

>                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!

Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
  "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
  "July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
  "August 25, 2000: PRAE TO ENTER JDGT AFGAINST DFT SCOTT BRADBURY AKA DOC
TAVISH FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND. JDGT ENTERED VS/SAID DFT IN AN AMT TO BE
ASSESSEED. IMPORTANT NOTICE, AFDT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. NOTICE MLD
8/25/2000 FILED @ 9:28 AM."
  I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on me by a Sheriff's Deputy nor on my attorney who is on record with
the court as stating:
  Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
 COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
   On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
   Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."  
         
                 Respectfully submitted
                 Daylin B. Leach Esquire

<END>

How could I answer perjurious complaints when neither I NOR my attorney were
never legally served the complaints by Shyster Yale F. Edeiken. But Ken McVay
knows that and he posts the lawsuit which was dismissed against me to smear me.
Ken McVay, the Director of the Nizkor Project, is not much on honesty!

>[Full court document available here:
>http://nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/<smear link munged>/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01

Hey Ken McVay haven't you learned yet? That lawsuit and its judgment against me
were DISMISSED way back in early 2001. Yale F. Edeiken lost and Yale F. Edeiken
has been publicly censured by the Supreme Court of his state (but not for his
lawsuit against me) which facts you don't want known but here they are:

        Shyster Yale F. Edeiken's deplorable record:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)

Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F. 
^^^^^^^  ^^^^ ^ 
              Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID    Case    County  District  
40290       122 DB 95  Lehigh     II   Public Censure Administered 10/20/98 
            ^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>

A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above 
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
                                                   ^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)

The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F. Edeiken a "private reprimand"
but he continued to act like the psychotic nut case he is and defied them and
refused to appear at his hearing more than once! He was then "forced" to appear
and the "private reprimand" had escalated to "PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest
court of his state! Furthermore the Disciplinary Board closed with: "It is
further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F. Edeiken] shall pay costs to the
Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), PaR.D.E."  IOW Yale had to pay the
Disciplinary Board to "kick his shyster ass" AFTER the Disciplinary Board of the
Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to serve numerous notices upon
him and compel him to attend his disciplinary hearing!! Yale also had to pay for
all costs of the investigation too! It's all detailed in that PDF file!! GO
LOOK!! 

BTW Yale F. Edeiken had already received one "Private Reprimand" in 1993 and
Yale had received an "Informal Admonition" in 1995! Then the bastard got "PUBLIC
CENSURE" in 1998!!! Looks like Yale F. Edeiken is real shining example of the
legal profession doesn't it? Why that shyster still has his law license is a
mystery to me! His assaulting a Deputy Sheriff should have done him in- in 1990!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse V2.1  S_0102
Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 19:02:18 GMT


						Tavish

	   ~~Famous Last Words from Jail Bird Ken McVay~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=c1dhpk01lqh@enews4.newsguy.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: McVayCarThief_1 AND McVayCarThief_2)
From: "Ken McVay, OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org>
Newsgroups: edm.general,edm.politics,ab.general,can.taxes
Subject: Re: Bracegirdles Both Deserve Jail,Also Auditors-Crown Appeals
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:46:13 -0800
Organization: The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org

"Ken McVay, OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> did write:

>It seems Bill Grosvenor is still afraid to publish under his own name.
>That's because he has no evidence that I have ever been arrested, let alone
>convicted, of any crime, 

Is that so? Did this Jewish web site lie when it reported this?

http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/Publications.asp?did=135&pid=21
(Link active February 11, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay)
Also:  http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/PublicationsPrint.asp?did=135
(Link active February 23, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay2)

The American Jewish Committee

"Hate and the Internet by Kenneth S. Stern
  On-Line Approaches
"My whole agenda is to try and remove their market, as it were. They have an
agenda to sell. If, by demonstrating that they are lying about a specific issue,
I can remove a few hundred people from their potential market place, then I�ve
done them some harm." � Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father�s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail.... <END>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooops looks like you have been caught lying again McVay! The "American Jewish
Committee" reported: "Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father�s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail" YET you stated above: "he has no evidence that I
have ever been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime"!
       Isn't being  "Apprehended" the same thing as being "arrested"? 
WordNet 2.0 Vocabulary Helper: apprehended
The verb apprehend has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts)
1. (2) get the picture, comprehend, savvy, dig, grasp, compass, apprehend -- get
the meaning of something; ``Do you comprehend the meaning of this letter?''  
2. (1) collar, nail, apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody;
``the police nabbed the suspected criminals'' ) 
3. apprehend, quail at -- (anticipate with dread or anxiety) 
-----
Which sense of "apprehended" applies to you Ken McVay? ANSWER: "collar, nail,
apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody; ``the police 
nabbed the suspected criminals'' ) 

YOU NOW HAVE A POLICE RECORD TOO KEN! Care to deny it Jail Bird McVay? 
Here's laughing at you!! You did state: "he has no evidence that I have ever
been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime.." BUT you were apprehended
or arrested for the crime of car theft and you were jailed! Once again you are
exposed as a liar! You weren't convicted because charges evidently weren't
pressed by your father!

The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461 
1-417-781-3282 
wpgold@kenmcvay.com
kmcvay@nizkor.org
KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 



_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
               <><><><><><><>   The Worlds Uncensored News Source   <><><><><><><><>
  
Re: Bradburyblubber is guilty
#1186
Author: Fred Ziffel
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:11
103 lines
6729 bytes
On 14 Mar 2004 23:38:43 -0600, <szkn06iy8ik.fsf@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:

>Arnold Ziffel of Xxxxxx <fred_ziffel@GreenAcresRFD12.net> writes:

Where I live is not relevant!!

>>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:32:47 -0800, <c315ak0d2c@enews4.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
>>OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:
>
>>>"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
>
>>>Why must you be afraid of Patrick Humphry, Tubbylard? Does he scare widdle
>>>bradblubber?
>
>>Now you shits have gone from claiming I harass people and intimidate them to
>>now claimintg I am intimidated by the same lot of losers who once complained
>>I intimidated them and for which I was even sued!!
>
>>BTW how am I guilty when the lawsuit against me was DISMISSED?
>
>BTW, since the case was dismissed on a jurisidctional point -- without
>prejudice -- why are you claiming you want to re-file a case you supposedly
>won, Bunglebury?

Where have I ever stated I was going to re-file the case? How can I when I
wasn't the one who filed it in the first place and why do you losers keep
denying the fact that neither my attorney NOR I were ever legally served those
complaints in the first place?

http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me   V1.1  S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3fuh@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT  EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2n02ehj@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spamfreek@nizkor.org> wrote:

>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:

ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place! 

>                   REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
>   NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:

For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!

Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
  "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
  "July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
  "August 25, 2000: PRAE TO ENTER JDGT AFGAINST DFT SCOTT BRADBURY AKA DOC
TAVISH FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND. JDGT ENTERED VS/SAID DFT IN AN AMT TO BE
ASSESSEED. IMPORTANT NOTICE, AFDT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. NOTICE MLD
8/25/2000 FILED @ 9:28 AM."
  I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on me by a Sheriff's Deputy nor on my attorney who is on record with
the court as stating:
  Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
 COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
   On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
   Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."  
         
                 Respectfully submitted
                 Daylin B. Leach Esquire


>34 days, and you're even more stupid than ever.  I'm going to have a good day.

Who cares!?
							Tavish


_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
               <><><><><><><>   The Worlds Uncensored News Source   <><><><><><><><>
  
Re: Bradburyblubber is guilty
#1187
Author: Joebruno
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 12:42
30 lines
2465 bytes
Fred Ziffel <fred_ziffel@GreenAcresRFD12.net> wrote in message news:<0ofa50l8go3jhtk4qqggudlm7ig2d9au8i@4ax.com>...
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:32:47 -0800, <c315ak0d2c@enews4.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
> OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:
> 
> >"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
> >
> >Why must you be afraid of Patrick Humphry, Tubbylard? Does he scare widdle
> >bradblubber?
> 
> Now you shits have gone from claiming I harass people and intimidate them to now
> claimintg I am intimidated by the same lot of losers who once complained I
> intimidated them and for which I was even sued!!

You didn't "intimidate" Yale. If you had, he wouldn't have had the
nerve to sue you, idiot.

> 
> BTW how am I guilty when the lawsuit against me was DISMISSED?


For the same reason that defendants charged on the basis of
inadmissable evidence are acquitted, blobbo.

If you sue someone for breach of contract in traffic court, the case
will be dismissed, too, idiot. The operative word is
J-U-R-I-S-D-I-C-T-I-O-N.


http://www.trachtman.org/MIDI/Misc/ChickenChowder.mid
Thus Spoke Bradbury
#1188
Author: Sara Salzman
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:25
111 lines
5737 bytes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <0ofa50l8go3jhtk4qqggudlm7ig2d9au8i@4ax.com>,
 Fred Ziffel <fred_ziffel@GreenAcresRFD12.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:32:47 -0800, <c315ak0d2c@enews4.newsguy.com>
> "Ken  McVay,
> OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:
> 
> >"Loose Cannon" <plhumphrey1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:5a858a1e.0403132055.5544ecd3@posting.google.com...
> >
> >Why must you be afraid of Patrick Humphry, Tubbylard? Does he
> >scare widdle bradblubber?
> 
> Now you shits have gone from claiming I harass people and
> intimidate them to  now
> claimintg I am intimidated by the same lot of losers who once
> complained I intimidated them and for which I was even sued!!
> 
> BTW how am I guilty when the lawsuit against me was DISMISSED?
> 
> You aren't being very nice Kenneth McVay and what you are doing
> reflects more  on
> you than it does me! You and your NIZKOR web site are losing
> credibility as  your
> lies and your dirty tactics are becoming even wider known by more
> and more people. You are supposed to be an honest person engaging
> in Holocaust  Research
> BUT you are nothing but a smear agent who attempts to violate
> people's rights  to
> privacy in order to attempt to intimidate them into silence when
> you don't  agree
> with their views!
> 
> >http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/<smear link deleted>
> 
> I thought you didn't keep files on private citizens!!
> 
> >Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:
> >
> >Scott Bradbury
> 
> The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
> P.O. Box 244, Station A
> Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
> 1-250-616-9431
> 1-416-966-0461 
> 1-417-781-3282 
> wpgold@kenmcvay.com
> kmcvay@nizkor.org
> KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 
> Residential address:
> Ken McVay
> 995 Bowen Road  Apt. 3108
> Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada
> 
>     Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post
> where  
>      the people live who made such info public in the first place!
> Sara Salzman


I DON'T HAVE TO PROVE SHIT!!
Message-ID: <djn7201t7f8vtcoe9l4elnn0t0ekuqhn4g@4ax.com>

GET THAT INTO YOUR HARD HEAD YOU FUCKING BASTARD!!!
Message-ID: <7877iv8u1t59ffhh0mlivbtkami0ugpbjn@4ax.com>

I KEEP TELLING YOU BUT YOU AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION!! AS LONG AS YOUR
PALS KEEP POSTING WHERE I LIVE THEN I WILL KEEP POSTING WHERE THE TWO
SHITS LIVE WHO MADE THE INFO AVAILABLE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!  LIVE
WITH IT PIG!!
Message-ID: <bdfn30hqo2nvdmooed45m72vdajknflae6@4ax.com>

Implying I have a mental defect is all you have isn't is wh*re?
Message-ID: <iksmgvgbh22ro8i32cjpo4gf2kep53dq98@4ax.com>

You like making with the FAT insults don't you KIKE?
Message-ID: <r70itvgvqp0hfrn0nqng7ojps8be4m7ehe@4ax.com>

You must be referring to Yale "The Whale" Edeiken!
Message-ID: <mrsdrvkn3nhc6aql45n7hcg4i4htjvm22p@4ax.com>

The whale is Yale as in Yale The Whale!
Message-ID: <vegarvsmooa86m0beia1qlfraqhjue8leb@4ax.com>

Well come to my jurisdiction and make your same accusations and get
your mentor to repeat his and we will see how quick you two become
jailbirds. PUT UP OR SHUT UP YOU LYING WH*RE!!
Message-ID: <k6e4hv00ma0udrsmnr5ssj6n4k5omkhii6@4ax.com>



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBQFWutSdySwjCuT94EQISvQCgqPCGMLbG56F+PVtmQiKO/06UQIYAoKdU
cwjSGRxrozzeTnyqX80zyxyY
=9veR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong 
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
     --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above 
Thus Spoke Bradbury
#1189
Author: Sara Salzman
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:27
100 lines
5286 bytes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <31ga509ce1c8gjgna64p8v60qpg0m4thbp@4ax.com>,
 Fred Ziffel <fred_ziffel@GreenAcresRFD12.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:33:23 -0800, <c315bo0d39@enews4.newsguy.com>
> "Ken  McVay,
> OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:
> 
> You aren't being very nice Kenneth McVay and what you are doing
> reflects more  on
> you than it does me! You and your NIZKOR web site are losing
> credibility as  your
> lies and your dirty tactics are becoming even wider known by more
> and more people. You are supposed to be an honest person engaging
> in Holocaust  Research
> BUT you are nothing but a smear agent who attempts to violate
> people's rights  to
> privacy in order to attempt to intimidate them into silence when
> you don't  agree
> with their views!
> 
> >http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/<smear link deleted>
> 
> I thought you didn't keep files on private citizens!!
> 
> >Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:
> >
> >Scott Bradbury
> 
> The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
> P.O. Box 244, Station A
> Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
> 1-250-616-9431
> 1-416-966-0461 
> 1-417-781-3282 
> wpgold@kenmcvay.com
> kmcvay@nizkor.org
> KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 
> Residential address:
> Ken McVay
> 995 Bowen Road  Apt. 3108
> Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada
> 
>     Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post
> where  
>      the people live who made such info public in the first place!
> Sara Salzman
  

GET THIS INTO YOUR HARD HEAD YOU GOD DAMNED EVIL WH*RE-- EACH AND
EVERY TIME ONE OF YOUR FELLOW THUGS POSTS WHERE I LIVE THEN I WILL
POST WHERE YOU AND YALE LIVE!! YOU CAN COUNT ON IT WH*RE!!
Message-ID: td1vgvsiogaet6hchjpi7ocf9a4u9866ob@4ax.com

Perhaps if I post where your father lives then maybe you will be
persuaded!!!
Message-ID: <b3cefv44ve7luh5etpfeadkr39oj1p8m9r@4ax.com>

Subject yourself to my jurisdiction and you will be given a dose of
reality! MAKE MY DAY!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
Message-ID: <f5r5hv092109l8gv14uktp6dptntvnkl7t@4ax.com>

You provide a starting point for more hatrassmenmt-- that's the big
deal you bastard!
Message-ID: <pg3hgv4gln3s948cthn1cah2sqnrtav5h8@4ax.com>

Re-read what you said above and see who is the fucking idiot!
Message-ID: <f9upgvgg9k4kdo031hp7kba7snha4ud3bv@4ax.com>

Go smoke some crack with yo gangstas.
Message-ID: <ptltgv48v6a267etp3qiucqvbk1k9aa7pn@4ax.com>

Why don't you come to my jurisdiction and file a complaint
Message-ID: <r8o9hv0p0gtd8qlfk05h1l1ctvnune1r2l@4ax.com>

Don't hold your breath wh*re. If you want to press charges or
litigate come to my town and mind you by subjecting yourself to the
legal system of my jurisdiction I will be able to resolve some old
matters myself.
Message-ID: <gj1bhv8m41a09nj79sp1oddi6n1lo5bbef@4ax.com>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBQFWvOydySwjCuT94EQIX6wCgjMuRx0wH3yE9lSxShpz47mz/CC4Ani4G
+F9qd6Yo9yUFYv6WZN4jC/JA
=pWyN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong 
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
     --Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above 
Re: Thus Spoke Bradbury
#1190
Author: MommyBartlo
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:51
114 lines
5286 bytes
Wow,

I gotta set Sara up with my Joey !!!!

K00k * 2 = FUN

Do you have a drivers license Sara ??  good, then it's a done deal.

come move my son out of my house !!!

xoxoxo
--MommyBartlo--



Sara Salzman wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> In article <31ga509ce1c8gjgna64p8v60qpg0m4thbp@4ax.com>,
>  Fred Ziffel <fred_ziffel@GreenAcresRFD12.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:33:23 -0800, <c315bo0d39@enews4.newsguy.com>
>>"Ken  McVay,
>>OBC" <kmcvay@nizkor.org> wrote:
>>
>>You aren't being very nice Kenneth McVay and what you are doing
>>reflects more  on
>>you than it does me! You and your NIZKOR web site are losing
>>credibility as  your
>>lies and your dirty tactics are becoming even wider known by more
>>and more people. You are supposed to be an honest person engaging
>>in Holocaust  Research
>>BUT you are nothing but a smear agent who attempts to violate
>>people's rights  to
>>privacy in order to attempt to intimidate them into silence when
>>you don't  agree
>>with their views!
>>
>>
>>>http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/<smear link deleted>
>>
>>I thought you didn't keep files on private citizens!!
>>
>>
>>>Scott Bradbury's address and phone number:
>>>
>>>Scott Bradbury
>>
>>The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
>>P.O. Box 244, Station A
>>Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
>>1-250-616-9431
>>1-416-966-0461 
>>1-417-781-3282 
>>wpgold@kenmcvay.com
>>kmcvay@nizkor.org
>>KMCVAY@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG 
>>Residential address:
>>Ken McVay
>>995 Bowen Road  Apt. 3108
>>Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4 Canada
>>
>>    Seeing how people like to post where I live then I will post
>>where  
>>     the people live who made such info public in the first place!
>>Sara Salzman
> 
>   
> 
> GET THIS INTO YOUR HARD HEAD YOU GOD DAMNED EVIL WH*RE-- EACH AND
> EVERY TIME ONE OF YOUR FELLOW THUGS POSTS WHERE I LIVE THEN I WILL
> POST WHERE YOU AND YALE LIVE!! YOU CAN COUNT ON IT WH*RE!!
> Message-ID: td1vgvsiogaet6hchjpi7ocf9a4u9866ob@4ax.com
> 
> Perhaps if I post where your father lives then maybe you will be
> persuaded!!!
> Message-ID: <b3cefv44ve7luh5etpfeadkr39oj1p8m9r@4ax.com>
> 
> Subject yourself to my jurisdiction and you will be given a dose of
> reality! MAKE MY DAY!! PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
> Message-ID: <f5r5hv092109l8gv14uktp6dptntvnkl7t@4ax.com>
> 
> You provide a starting point for more hatrassmenmt-- that's the big
> deal you bastard!
> Message-ID: <pg3hgv4gln3s948cthn1cah2sqnrtav5h8@4ax.com>
> 
> Re-read what you said above and see who is the fucking idiot!
> Message-ID: <f9upgvgg9k4kdo031hp7kba7snha4ud3bv@4ax.com>
> 
> Go smoke some crack with yo gangstas.
> Message-ID: <ptltgv48v6a267etp3qiucqvbk1k9aa7pn@4ax.com>
> 
> Why don't you come to my jurisdiction and file a complaint
> Message-ID: <r8o9hv0p0gtd8qlfk05h1l1ctvnune1r2l@4ax.com>
> 
> Don't hold your breath wh*re. If you want to press charges or
> litigate come to my town and mind you by subjecting yourself to the
> legal system of my jurisdiction I will be able to resolve some old
> matters myself.
> Message-ID: <gj1bhv8m41a09nj79sp1oddi6n1lo5bbef@4ax.com>
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3 - not licensed for commercial use: www.pgp.com
> 
> iQA/AwUBQFWvOydySwjCuT94EQIX6wCgjMuRx0wH3yE9lSxShpz47mz/CC4Ani4G
> +F9qd6Yo9yUFYv6WZN4jC/JA
> =pWyN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
Re: Michael Jackson is innocent.
#1191
Author: Burp
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:08
11 lines
1997 bytes
> Kurt Knoll.


Ya'll be havin' a brother named Grassy???




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads