Re: Where are delayed branches handled?

Article View: net.arch

Article #2701

#2701

From: Pat Caudill
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1986 13:54

13 lines
1111 bytes

	Although I usually want an assembler to assemble
what I coded, there is precidence for assemblers doing
optimization. Besides long short jump, opcode selection
for imed, short, long offset or macros. I beleive the SOAP
(Symbolic Optimizing Assembly Program) did instruction
scheduling for a machine which this was very important
and also very difficult. Code for the machine was mainly
in assembly language. The machine is now somewhat dated
however.

			Pat Caudill
			Tektronix!tekcrl!patc.UUCP

Technical Details

Message-ID: <931@tekcrl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!patc

References: <299@vaxb.calgary.UUCP> <823@jplgodo.UUCP> <20150@rochester.ARPA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!patc
From: patc@tekcrl.UUCP (Pat Caudill)
Newsgroups: net.arch
Subject: Re: Where are delayed branches handled?
Message-ID: <931@tekcrl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 15-Aug-86 09:54:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekcrl.931
Posted: Fri Aug 15 09:54:37 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 22-Aug-86 06:30:21 EDT
References: <299@vaxb.calgary.UUCP> <823@jplgodo.UUCP> <20150@rochester.ARPA>
Reply-To: patc@tekcrl.UUCP (Pat Caudill)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message