Re: Floating point performance

Thread View: net.arch

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Barry Shein Sat, 18 Oct 1986 23:22

#3041

Author: Barry Shein
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1986 23:22

23 lines
1533 bytes


From: nather@ut-sally.UUCP (Ed Nather)
>Has hardware technology progressed to the point where we might want to
>consider making a VERY LARGE integer machine -- with integers long
>enough so floating point operations would be unnecessary?

Why wouldn't the packed decimal formats of machines like the IBM/370
be sufficient for most uses (31 decimal digits+sign expressed as
nibbles, slightly more complicated size range for multiplication and
division operands, basic arithmetic operations supported.) That's not
a huge range but it's a lot larger than 32-bit binary. I believe it
was developed because a while ago people like the gov't noticed you
can't do anything with 32-bit regs and their budgets, and floating
point was unacceptable for many things. There are no packed decimal
registers so I assume the instructions are basically memory-bandwidth
limited (not unusual.)

The VAX seems to support operand lengths up to 16-bits (65k*2 digits?
I've never tried it.) There is some primitive support for this (ABCD,
SBCD) in the 68K.

	-Barry Shein, Boston University

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads