Article View: net.astro.expert
Article #35Re: Stability of the 'Nemesis' system
From: Ed Nather
Date: Sun, 27 May 1984 02:50
Date: Sun, 27 May 1984 02:50
26 lines
1774 bytes
1774 bytes
[]
>I have in my hands a preprint of a paper by Piet Hut (from Princeton)
> . . . .
>After studying these effects, he concludes that such a system IS
>possible, although it should come apart in time. A related factor to
>its instability is that the period is not precisely regular, but may
>vary as much as 20%.
>
> Jay Parks
Is this intended to convince anyone of anything? Of course it will come
apart in time -- eveything does. The question is: if this mythical companion
had been formed along with our solar system, could it have survived until
now? (i.e. is this idea totally impossible, or merely wildly improbable?)
A 20% slop in period ought to cover virtually any funny-looking peaks in a
power spectrum dominated by noise, and allow true believers to "save the
hypothesis" without too much trouble.
I've seen more convincing evidence for the Great Pumpkin.
--
Ed Nather
{allegra,ihnp4}!{ut-sally,noao}!utastro!nather
Astronomy Dept., U. of Texas, Austin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31@utastro.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!natherReferences:
<339@kpnoa.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utastro.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!nather From: nather@utastro.UUCP (Ed Nather) Newsgroups: net.astro.expert Subject: Re: Stability of the 'Nemesis' system Message-ID: <31@utastro.UUCP> Date: Sat, 26-May-84 22:50:27 EDT Article-I.D.: utastro.31 Posted: Sat May 26 22:50:27 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jun-84 02:21:10 EDT References: <339@kpnoa.UUCP> Organization: UTexas Astronomy Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 26