Thread View: net.astro.expert
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by naticchioni
Fri, 14 Feb 1986 12:34
Large aperture vs. small for nebular viewing.
Author: naticchioni
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1986 12:34
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1986 12:34
31 lines
1718 bytes
1718 bytes
I AM INTERESTED IN BUILDING A 13 TO 14 IN REFLECTING TELESCOPE FOR DEEP SKY VIEWING OF NEBULARS. I HAVE A 4.25" F/10 NEWTONIAN THAT I USE NOW FROM 35X TO 200X BUT WOULD LIKE A WIDER FIELD OF VIEW AND A BRIGHTER IMAGE. THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES THAT SELL LIGHTWEIGHT 1/8 WAVE MIRRORS AT F/4.5 TO F/6 AND THEY CLAIM THIS IS WHAT I WANT. I AM HOPING TO KEEP THE COST OF THE SYSTEM BOTH IN TIME AND MONEY MINIMAL BUT STILL HAVE A GOOD VIEW. THE SHORT FOCUS NEWTONIAN SEEMS TO BE THE WAY TO GO BUT I HAVE BEEN READING THAT A SMALLER MORE ACCURATE MIRROR WITH A LONGER F RATIO IS BETTER. IS THERE A TRADE OFF POINT IN SIZE, ACCURACY, AND F RATIO? I WOULD LIKE ANY RECOMENDATION ON WHAT OTHERS HAVE USED AND WHY? IS THERE ANY GOOD REFERENCES I COULD USE? ANY DATA OR FORMULAS WOULD ALSO BE APPRECATED. THANKYOU FOR YOUR HELP STEVEN M. NATICCHIONI DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. NRO5/F2 30 FORBES ROAD NORTHBORO, MA 01532 (617) 351-4862 P.S. "A LITTLE EXPERIENCE REPLACES A LOT OF THEORY!" NRLABS::NATICCHIONI
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads