Article View: net.auto.tech
Article #316Re: Laquer vs. Enamel
From: marc
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1985 12:43
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1985 12:43
10 lines
994 bytes
994 bytes
/* Written 8:48 pm Dec 18, 1985 by marc@haddock in haddock:net.auto.tech */
> Personally I prefer to spray laquor for the reason that you stated, wet
> sanding, dry sanding, and compounding are all recommended. With laquor, what
^^^^^^
OOPS! I REALLY MENT TO SAY ENAMEL!
-- Marc, WB1GRH
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<105200002@haddock.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!haddock!marcReferences:
<1287@ihuxi.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site haddock.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!haddock!marc From: marc@haddock.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto.tech Subject: Re: Laquer vs. Enamel Message-ID: <105200002@haddock.UUCP> Date: Thu, 19-Dec-85 07:43:00 EST Article-I.D.: haddock.105200002 Posted: Thu Dec 19 07:43:00 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Dec-85 05:16:17 EST References: <1287@ihuxi.UUCP> Lines: 10 Nf-ID: #R:ihuxi:-128700:haddock:105200002:000:358 Nf-From: haddock!marc Dec 19 07:43:00 1985