🚀 go-pugleaf

[]

bruce@dciem.UUCP (Bruce Ferguson)  writes:

>  There have been far too many dual postings, (net.auto &net.auto.tech)
>  of late. Please remember why the "tech" group was created...

I'd agree completely.  It can't be *that* hard to figure out in which group
a posting should appear.

>  By survey, it appears that many people read both groups anyway, so 
>  rest assured that your important opinions and recollections will get 
>  the audience they seek, even though they be posted only in net.auto.

True - but let's not take this to mean, then, that there's no need to
have the two groups.  The point of forming the tech group was not entirely
that some of us didn't want to read about non-tech topics.   There were
other reasons, as well.  Even though an individual may read both, it works
*much, much* better to have the topical areas separate - it is easier
and more coherent to follow discussions over time, for instance, when
you're not hopping, bouncing, weaving, and wading your way through a mixture of
tech and non-tech articles.

Can we try harder??

[This one dual-posted for obvious reasons :-)  ]

Mark Bernstein  (UT - Austin, Speech)