Article View: net.auto.tech
Article #623Re: Turbos and superchargers
From: Larry Lippman
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1986 21:53
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1986 21:53
38 lines
3121 bytes
3121 bytes
> I think i might have an idea, but I am not sure. Could someone please
> post a condensed explaination of the difference between turbochargers and
> superchargers? What are the advantages of one over the other?
The amount of fuel-air mixture which is introduced into an internal
combustion engine PER CYCLE is generally referring to as a ``charge''. A
``supercharger'' by definition is any device which increases the amount of
charge per cycle above that of a normally aspirated engine.
While a supercharger can be anyone of several types of air compression
devices, the term ``supercharger'' seems only to be applied to application of
such devices to internal combustion engines; i.e., the same air compression
device used for another application may simply be called a turbocompressor,
rotary vane compressor, rotary blade compressor, etc.
From what I can gather, a ``turbocharger'' is a turbocompressor applied
as a supercharger.
A compressor used as a supercharger can be powered by three means:
(1) direct coupled to the engine, (2) powered by a close-coupled exhaust-driven
turbine, and (3) powered by an electric motor with speed control. Compressors
used in (1) and (3) are low speed (i.e., << 5000 RPM), whereas devices used in
(2) are high speed (i.e., >> 5000 RPM).
Since turbine technology results in the smallest possible size for a
compressor, it is the most common device used in passenger vehicles. Since
turbines require higher RPM's than can be conveniently achieved by direct
coupling to the engine, and since a turbine MOTOR as powered by engine
exhaust gases can generate the required RPM's, the combination of an exhaust-
driven turbine motor close-coupled to a turbocompressor is most commonly used
in passenger vehicles. I believe most people refer to this device when using
the term ``turbocharger''.
However, while ``supercharger'' is a precise engineering term, this
may not be the case for ``turbocharger'' - even though the two terms are often
used synonymously.
==> Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, New York <==
==> UUCP {decvax|dual|rocksanne|rocksvax|watmath}!sunybcs!kitty!larry <==
==> VOICE 716/741-9185 {rice|shell}!baylor!/ <==
==> FAX 716/741-9635 {G1, G2, G3 modes} duke!ethos!/ <==
==> seismo!/ <==
==> "Have you hugged your cat today?" ihnp4!/ <==
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<740@kitty.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!rocksvax!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!larryReferences:
<2763@sunybcs.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!rocksvax!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!larry From: larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) Newsgroups: net.auto.tech Subject: Re: Turbos and superchargers Message-ID: <740@kitty.UUCP> Date: Wed, 22-Jan-86 16:53:19 EST Article-I.D.: kitty.740 Posted: Wed Jan 22 16:53:19 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 26-Jan-86 05:34:19 EST References: <2763@sunybcs.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Recognition Research Corp., Clarence, NY Lines: 38