Re: A better way to check lockfiles for HoneyDANBER.

Article View: net.bugs.uucp

Article #507

#507

From: Darryl Baker
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1985 18:55

9 lines
988 bytes

As I said in the previous article I'm working from documentation. The
documentation and it says it uses the return value not that it checks
the errno value as to whether or not it is EPERM or ESRCH. Though if
it does it would work just fine to define ATTSVKILL.
-- 
				from the sleepy terminal of
				Darryl Baker
				[ihnp4!]laidbak!dpb

Technical Details

Message-ID: <251@laidbak.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!dual!qantel!ihnp4!laidbak!dpb

References: <247@laidbak.UUCP> <5229@allegra.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site laidbak.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!dual!qantel!ihnp4!laidbak!dpb
From: dpb@laidbak.UUCP (Darryl Baker)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp
Subject: Re: A better way to check lockfiles for HoneyDANBER.
Message-ID: <251@laidbak.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 14:55:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: laidbak.251
Posted: Wed Oct  9 14:55:11 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 08:15:12 EDT
References: <247@laidbak.UUCP> <5229@allegra.UUCP>
Reply-To: dpb@laidbak.UUCP (Darryl Baker)
Organization: LAI Chicago
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message