Thread View: net.bugs.uucp
6 messages
6 total messages
Started by Mike Rubin
Fri, 09 May 1986 16:01
ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: Mike Rubin
Date: Fri, 09 May 1986 16:01
Date: Fri, 09 May 1986 16:01
8 lines
877 bytes
877 bytes
It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept
ONLY EVEN PARITY". This makes it unable to converse with various
other systems, including (it seems) 4.3bsd. The fix: you must put
the magic cookie "P_ZERO" in your send-expect sequence, e.g.
foovax Any ACU 1200 5551212 "" P_ZERO ....
--Mike Rubin Timeplex, Inc. {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: George Robbins
Date: Sun, 11 May 1986 23:23
Date: Sun, 11 May 1986 23:23
21 lines
1735 bytes
1735 bytes
In article <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> rubin@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes:
>
>It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept
>ONLY EVEN PARITY". This makes it unable to converse with various
>other systems, including (it seems) 4.3bsd. The fix: you must put
>the magic cookie "P_ZERO" in your send-expect sequence, e.g.
> foovax Any ACU 1200 5551212 "" P_ZERO ....
>
>--Mike Rubin Timeplex, Inc. {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
Please remember to indicate what release you are talking about, and
provide more historical and environmental information.
We have been using Ultrix 1.1 on a 750, and have made uucp connections
to various machines and flaovers of unix without running into any parity
related problems. So, are you talking about a new Ultrix 1.2 problem, or
do you have some other kind of problem?
--
George Robbins - now working with, uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|caip}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV
Commodore, Engineering Department fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)
Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: Kenneth J. Lester
Date: Mon, 12 May 1986 20:31
Date: Mon, 12 May 1986 20:31
30 lines
1969 bytes
1969 bytes
In article <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> rubin@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes:
>
>It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept
>ONLY EVEN PARITY". This makes it unable to converse with various
>other systems, including (it seems) 4.3bsd. The fix: you must put
>the magic cookie "P_ZERO" in your send-expect sequence, e.g.
> foovax Any ACU 1200 5551212 "" P_ZERO ....
>
>--Mike Rubin Timeplex, Inc. {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
We were using Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX 750, and have made uucp connections to
various unix machines (Version 7, Sun 2.2, and System 5.2) without running
into any parity problems. A week ago we upgrade to Ultrix-32 1.2 and it
didn't break any of our uucp connections. We do not use P_ZERO in our
send-expect sequence. In fact the uucp installation and administration
manual for both versions state that P_ZERO is the default.
It would be helpful if you stated the exact version of Ultrix that is causing
this difficulty.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Lester
System Administrator, Software Tools Laboratory
Product Software Engineering
USPS: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, 901 Elmgrove Rd., Rochester, NY 14650
VOICE: 716 726-0322
UUCP: {allegra, seismo}!rochester!kodak!ektools!ken
ARPA: kodak!ektools!ken@rochester.ARPA
Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: Mike Rubin
Date: Thu, 15 May 1986 23:44
Date: Thu, 15 May 1986 23:44
14 lines
1337 bytes
1337 bytes
> >It seems that ULTRIX uucp defaults to "send even parity and accept
> >ONLY EVEN PARITY"....
>
> We were using Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX 750, and have made uucp connections to
> various unix machines (Version 7, Sun 2.2, and System 5.2) without running
> into any parity problems.... [and Ultrix 1.2 also works]
We're also running Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX-750; from the replies on the
net I am beginning to suspect our modems (Microcom's) are munging something
although I told them to use 8 bits, no parity. Oh well.
Wasn't there traffic on the net a while back describing some uucp problem
between Ultrix and 4.3?
--Mike Rubin {topaz, philabs!wu1}!timeplex!mrubin
Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: Craig Harris
Date: Mon, 19 May 1986 13:23
Date: Mon, 19 May 1986 13:23
9 lines
1057 bytes
1057 bytes
Don't know if this is what you are having problems with, but I have gotten these microcom modems functional with uucp on a couple of machines, though not Ultrix 1.2. You might check to make sure that the Flow Control is turned off. That has bitten me several times. UUCP (at least the versions I was working with) doesn't handle that well. Craig Harris Laboratory for Laser Energetics University of Rochester
Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Author: Frederick M. Avolio
Date: Thu, 22 May 1986 03:53
Date: Thu, 22 May 1986 03:53
18 lines
1582 bytes
1582 bytes
In article <4971@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>, rubin@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes:
> We're also running Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX-750; from the replies on the
> net I am beginning to suspect our modems (Microcom's) are munging something
> ... Wasn't there traffic on the net a while back describing some uucp problem
> between Ultrix and 4.3?
Look, for the record... We run Ultrix-32 V1.2. We ran V1.1 and V1.0.
Ran all the field test versions in between. We talk to System V
systems, 4.2BSD systems, 4.1C systems, V7 systems, 4.3 systems, and
System III systems. We talk to Goulds, Pyramids, other VAXes, Wicats
(at a time), and a 3B-something. We don't have problems with UUCP to
any of them. The same can be said for DECVAX, a usenet backbone site.
Why DECVAX even talks to european systems! :-)
--
Fred @ DEC Ultrix Applications Center
INET: avolio@decuac.DEC.COM * Fight the Fight *
UUCP: {decvax,seismo,cbosgd}!decuac!avolio * Rescue the Unborn *
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads