Article View: net.bugs.v7
Article #164Re: The Great Net Cleanup Part IIa
From: David Sherman
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1985 20:02
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1985 20:02
23 lines
1665 bytes
1665 bytes
I feel very strongly that net.bugs.v7 should not go away.
It serves an extremely useful purpose, and cross-posting is
to be expected. We run v7 here. If someone finds a bug which
is present in (say) 4BSD and v7, they'll cross-post to those
two groups. I, needless to say, do not read net.bugs.4bsd.
I read everything in net.bugs.v7 VERY carefully. I also
post to it when I discover bugs which others may want to know.
There are still lots of v7 sites out there.
There is an important distinction between little-used leisure
groups (net.rec.whatever) and little-used technical groups
which have a specific and well-defined purpose. If even ten
articles a year appear in net.bugs.v7, and five of those mention
bugs which are present on my machine, I sure want access to them.
Remember, not everyone can keep up with net.unix-wizards or other
high-volume groups where such bugs might be reported.
Dave Sherman
The Law Society of Upper Canada
Toronto
--
{ ihnp4!utzoo pesnta utcs hcr decvax!utcsri } !lsuc!dave
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<743@lsuc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!daveReferences:
<696@gatech.CSNET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!lsuc!dave From: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) Newsgroups: net.bugs.v7,net.news.group Subject: Re: The Great Net Cleanup Part IIa Message-ID: <743@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Tue, 6-Aug-85 16:02:17 EDT Article-I.D.: lsuc.743 Posted: Tue Aug 6 16:02:17 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 16:10:51 EDT References: <696@gatech.CSNET> Reply-To: dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) Organization: Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto Lines: 23 Summary: net.bugs.v7 serves an important and useful purpose