Re: Computer bugs in the year 2000

Article View: net.bugs

Article #376

#376

From: james armstrong
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 1985 18:18

4 lines
757 bytes

>The year 2000 *is* a leap year, despite what many algorithms tell you.
>The year 2400 is *not* a leap year.

Actually, 2400 is a leap year.  2100, 2200, and 2300 are not.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <261@abnji.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxi!mhuxh!mhuxv!abnji!jca

References: <974@utastro.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site abnji.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxi!mhuxh!mhuxv!abnji!jca
From: jca@abnji.UUCP (james armstrong)
Newsgroups: net.bugs,net.flame,net.puzzle
Subject: Re: Computer bugs in the year 2000
Message-ID: <261@abnji.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 1-Feb-85 13:18:58 EST
Article-I.D.: abnji.261
Posted: Fri Feb  1 13:18:58 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Feb-85 12:05:55 EST
References: <974@utastro.UUCP>
Organization: ATTIS - Somerset, NJ
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message