🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <415@lsuc.UUCP> dave@lsuc.UUCP (David Sherman) writes:
>|| If after 24 games the players are tied, the match will continue
>|| one game a time, until one game is won. That is, the first to
>|| win a game after 24 games will be declared champ.
>
>That sounds like an insane rule to me. As soon as a player
>is down a couple of games, he'll play the next 24-N to a
>draw (not losing more than 3) and start from scratch in sudden-death!

Ummm ... Dave ... notice the key phrase "the players are tied". They
must be tied at the end of the normal series in order to go into
sudden-death (just like a hockey game! :-) ).  So playing to draw when
you're down would just ensure your loss.  This is much better than the
old system where matches draw out for ever and ever.  Under this
system, I believe Kasparov would have won as I think Karpov won his
five games fairly quickly before they started drawing.

In any case, even if the new system is *much* better by quantum leaps,
there is *no way* they should interrupt an ongoing match.  RULES
SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED IN MID-GAME!  Rumours say that Karpov is
beginning to suffer from mental illness due to the pressure --- is
this the reasoning behind the ICF's decision: they don't want Kasparov
to win?

				   \tom haapanen
				   watmath!watdcsu!haapanen
Don't cry, don't do anything
No lies, back in the government
No tears, party time is here again
President Gas is up for president		 (c) Psychedelic Furs, 1982