Re: Why can't a machine be World's Check

Article View: net.chess

Article #852

#852

From: ron
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1985 17:43

5 lines
836 bytes

The Samuels checker program (mentioned in the first response to this note)
was in fact better than all human players, including the world champion,
at the time.  In checkers, there's probably no comparison (today) between
the best programs and the humans.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9100002@ada-uts.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!yale!ada-uts!ron

References: <474@oakhill.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ada-uts.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!yale!ada-uts!ron
From: ron@ada-uts.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.chess
Subject: Re: Why can't a machine be World's Check
Message-ID: <9100002@ada-uts.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 9-Aug-85 13:43:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ada-uts.9100002
Posted: Fri Aug  9 13:43:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 14-Aug-85 00:37:09 EDT
References: <474@oakhill.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:oakhill:-47400:ada-uts:9100002:000:256
Nf-From: ada-uts!ron    Aug  9 13:43:00 1985

Reply to Parent Message