Article View: net.comics
Article #2693Re: Doonesbury
From: Danny
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1986 16:00
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1986 16:00
25 lines
1512 bytes
1512 bytes
In article <577@ssc-vax.UUCP> arlo@ssc-vax.UUCP (James Campiche) writes:
>...
>How come no one ever talks about Doonesbury, anyway?
'Cause it's not funny, anymore. Before his sabatical (sp?) his
work was liberal, but funny. Now, it's just liberal.
Actually, I've not read the strip in over a month, now. I had
waited with baity breath for his return, but when it came, I was
severly disapointed.
Now, mind you, this is just my own opinion, if you like the strip,
fine. I just don't care for it any more.
And to top it off, "Bloom County" had been on the first page of
the Sunday funnies, but since "Doonesbury" came back, Opus et al have
been relegated to the middle!
"Now, THAT is a tail!"
- Oliver Wendal Jones
Danny
--
Daniel S. Cox
({siesmo!gatech|ihnp4!akgua}!itm!danny)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<204@itm.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!drillsys!gatech!itm!dannyReferences:
<892@hou2d.UUCP> <577@ssc-vax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!drillsys!gatech!itm!danny From: danny@itm.UUCP (Danny) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: Doonesbury Message-ID: <204@itm.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Mar-86 11:00:20 EST Article-I.D.: itm.204 Posted: Fri Mar 7 11:00:20 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 9-Mar-86 00:52:08 EST References: <892@hou2d.UUCP> <577@ssc-vax.UUCP> Reply-To: danny@xelos.UUCP (Daniel S. Cox) Organization: In Touch Ministries Atlanta, GA Lines: 25 Keywords: unfunny