IBM DB2 lacks record locking

Article View: net.database

Article #53

#53

From: Jerry Carlin
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1985 22:07

10 lines
911 bytes

From Datamation, October 15 issue, page 13:

"... Notably absent so far from [DB2] has been an effective record-level
locking feature that is critically important for performing simultaneous
updates to a single database."

And we thought that only Unix DBMS's had problems with record locking :-)
-- 
voice= 415 823-2441
uucp={ihnp4,dual,qantel}!ptsfa!jmc

Technical Details

Message-ID: <941@ptsfa.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!well!ptsfa!jmc

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ptsfa.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!well!ptsfa!jmc
From: jmc@ptsfa.UUCP (Jerry Carlin)
Newsgroups: net.database
Subject: IBM DB2 lacks record locking
Message-ID: <941@ptsfa.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Oct-85 17:07:13 EST
Article-I.D.: ptsfa.941
Posted: Tue Oct 29 17:07:13 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 31-Oct-85 09:00:06 EST
Organization: Pacific Bell, San Francisco
Lines: 10
Keywords: DB2 record-locking