Re: Notation

Article View: net.games.chess

Article #176

#176

From: ashby
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1985 16:51

5 lines
831 bytes

When I called descriptive notation inferior, I didn't mean
to touch off another descriptive vs algebraic debate.  I
was simply trying to be humorous; I guess I should have
used a :-) somewhere.  Oh, well.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <22300014@uiucdcsp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsp!ashby

References: <790@osu-eddie.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uiucdcsp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsp!ashby
From: ashby@uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.games.chess
Subject: Re: Notation
Message-ID: <22300014@uiucdcsp>
Date: Fri, 15-Nov-85 11:51:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsp.22300014
Posted: Fri Nov 15 11:51:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 16-Nov-85 21:03:58 EST
References: <790@osu-eddie.UUCP>
Lines: 5
Nf-ID: #R:osu-eddie.UUCP:790:uiucdcsp:22300014:000:208
Nf-From: uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU!ashby    Nov 15 10:51:00 1985

Reply to Parent Message