Thread View: net.games.chess
5 messages
5 total messages
Started by trb
Tue, 07 Jan 1986 20:15
KK rematch on hold
Author: trb
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1986 20:15
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1986 20:15
39 lines
2235 bytes
2235 bytes
From: trb (Andrew Tannenbaum) To: net.games.ches -------- Gleaned from the NYTimes 1/7 -- Looks like the Kasparov-Karpov rematch, originally scheduled for February 10, isn't going to start then. Kasparov is protesting that it's ridiculous for him to have to play for the championship again in February, then again this coming fall when the regular championship, on the new two-year cycle, is scheduled to start. All this, of course, after having played 48+24 games this past year. Kasparov recently beat Jan Timman in a match in the Netherlands, and Karpov is currently playing a tournament in Vienna. And now, my opinion -- Kasparov has control in this one, as he is popular, and Karpov is not, and Karpov is up to his neck in trouble besides. Karpov gained his title by forfeit. Karpov's personality is colorless. Karpov is in trouble with the Soviet government over his harboring foriegn currency which he made in semi-licit dealings over chess computer endorsements. Karpov was allegedly in a drug-induced state of ill health at the end of the 48-game match and probably is still recovering. Karpov lost the match that was supposed to be his crowning achievement before becoming a communist party official. Who knows what will happen now? (He'll still become a cp official.) I think the current championship scheme (where the champion has only to defend his title against the winner of an interzonal elimation tournament, and then he gets a rematch if he loses) favors the reigning champion too much. It seems to say that the champion is more important than the championship. Andrew Tannenbaum Interactive Boston, MA 617-247-1155 --------
Re: KK rematch on hold
Author: Eric G. Stern
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1986 17:48
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 1986 17:48
34 lines
1967 bytes
1967 bytes
> > From: trb (Andrew Tannenbaum) > To: net.games.ches > -------- > > And now, my opinion -- > > Kasparov has control in this one, as he is popular, and Karpov is not, > and Karpov is up to his neck in trouble besides. Karpov gained his > title by forfeit. Karpov's personality is colorless. Karpov is in > trouble with the Soviet government over his harboring foriegn currency > which he made in semi-licit dealings over chess computer endorsements. > Karpov was allegedly in a drug-induced state of ill health at the end > of the 48-game match and probably is still recovering. Karpov lost the > match that was supposed to be his crowning achievement before becoming > a communist party official. Who knows what will happen now? (He'll > still become a cp official.) > > -------- On the other hand, Kasparov is doubly damned in the eyes of the Soviet goverment because he is half Jewish and half Armenian, neither of which are good things to be in Soviet Russia. Also, I get the impression Kasparov takes no interest in Soviet or Communist party affairs and would be just as happy somewhere else. Karpov got the Soviet Chess Federation to put through the rules in his favor before the last tournament because he was the favorite of the Soviet government. It would be nice to have a chess match that really picked the best player rather than introduce all this politics and favoritism. Eric G. Stern
Re: KK rematch on hold
Author: trb
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1986 21:41
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1986 21:41
47 lines
2932 bytes
2932 bytes
> On the other hand, Kasparov is doubly damned in the eyes > of the Soviet goverment because he is half Jewish and > half Armenian, neither of which are good things to > be in Soviet Russia. Also, I get the impression > Kasparov takes no interest in Soviet or Communist party > affairs and would be just as happy somewhere else. > Karpov got the Soviet Chess Federation to put through > the rules in his favor before the last tournament > because he was the favorite of the Soviet government. > It would be nice to have a chess match that really > picked the best player rather than introduce all this > politics and favoritism. > > Eric G. Stern You are underestimating Kasparov's power in the Soviet Union. I think most of my info is from Chess Life magazine over the past year, especially from articles by Lev Alburt. Kasparov has connections in the CP that are higher than Karpov's. As I recall very vaguely, Kasparov is the darling of a Politburo official (from his home Azerbaijan, if I'm not mistaken), whereas Karpov's buddy in the political hierarchy is at a lower level. Kasparov is "half Jewish" -- His father's family is named Weinstein, his mother's was Kasparian, which was Russianized. This is something of a disadvantage to him, but all the Russian chess champions for a long time have been Jews (except Karpov), so while it would be preferable to have a "great white hope" like Karpov, I think that the Sovs have grown accustomed to Jews in chess. Kasparov is very well treated in the Soviet Union, he is one of the few people with a personal computer, he is living with a famous actress, he's young, suave, etc. He's not suffering too much. He seems to be a symbol that Moscow can point to and say "look, we're modern." I agree that Kasparov would probably rather be a New Yorker, but he's playing his cards properly. He can't just just go shooting his mouth off about defecting without getting his head handed to him. (Yes, a mangled mingled metaphor. Don't bother me.) I don't pretend that life in the USSR is all that simple. I posted this stuff because there really isn't much on it in the US pop press. Check out the CL articles by Lev Alburt. Are there any other articles? Andrew Tannenbaum Interactive Boston, MA 617-247-1155
Re: KK rematch on hold
Author: Tom Tedrick
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1986 10:51
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1986 10:51
36 lines
1685 bytes
1685 bytes
> [ ... ] but all the Russian chess champions for a >long time have been Jews (except Karpov), so while it would be >preferable to have a "great white hope" like Karpov, [ ... ] Poor Karpov, the all Russian Communist Son of the Working Class. To be beaten by a Jew ... doesn't say much for Soviet attempts to prove the superiority of Soviet culture and eradicate Jewish culture. OK, here is a list of Soviet World Champions: Botvinnik (Jewish) Smyslov (not Jewish, I believe. I played him once ...) Tal (Jewish) Petrosian (not Jewish, I believe.) Spassky (not Jewish, I believe.) Karpov (not Jewish.) Kasparov (Jewish) In case it is of interest, here is a list of non-Soviet World Champions: Steinitz (Jewish) Lasker (Jewish) Capablanca (not) Alekhine (not) Euwe (not) Fischer (Jewish) Almost made it, or should have: Rubinstein (Jewish) Keres (not) Reshevesky (Jewish) Bronstein (Jewish) Korchnoi (Jewish)
Re: Orphaned Response
Author: trb
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1986 21:22
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1986 21:22
23 lines
1490 bytes
1490 bytes
From: trb (Andrew Tannenbaum) To: net.games.ches -------- > Gleaned from the NYTimes 1/7 -- > > Looks like the Kasparov-Karpov rematch, originally scheduled for > February 10, isn't going to start then. From the NYTimes 1/22 (I think) Kasparov has agreed to play his rematch with Karpov in late summer. Site hasn't been selected, Leningrad and London in the running. Also, there was a two-page spread on Kasparov, the new champion, in the Soviet Life magazine that just came out. It was typical SL propaganda, no mention of friction, a picture with a caption like "the competitors engaging in the traditional handshake before the game," even though Kasparov hasn't touched Karpov's hand since the beginning of the 72 games. Nothing new or interesting, but even that is sort of interesting. Andrew Tannenbaum Interactive Boston, MA 617-247-1155
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads