🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <873@clyde.UUCP> jona@clyde.UUCP (Jon Allingham) writes:
>I thought I had the original too, when I applied the ed script 3 or
>4 files didn't take, and of the ones that did, half of them wouldn't
>compile.
>-- 
>Jon M. Allingham	(201)386-3466	AT&T Bell Laboratories-WH
>
>"Beam me up Scotty, no intelligent life down here!"

We had this problem as well.  It isn't due us hacking the sources around,
as I restored from our tape archive ('cos Andries said that one needed
the ORIGINAL 1.0.2).  The date string in date.h was "Mon Apr 1 1985".

Is it possible that Andries generated the diffs from a DIFFERENT original
1.0.2?  I think we should be told (:-)).

Has anyone with the 1 Apr version managed to update to 1.0.3?  If so, could
they send me (or post) a set of *CONTEXT* diffs?  Pretty please?  I got
some rabid hackers here who expect me to do our 1.0.2 -> 1.0.3 upgrade
with the edscripts we received over the net.  No way, Jose!

							Kay.
BTW, I think this shows how useful context diffs are....  Andries, are
you listening?



-- 
"In a world without rational structure, even the most bizarre events must
eventually take place."   -- Philip Avalon, "On the Resurrection of Reagan"
			
			... mcvax!ukc!warwick!flame!kay