Re: Should invisible eyes transfix?!

Article View: net.games.hack

Article #553

#553

From: Troy Torgerson
Date: Mon, 06 May 1985 23:31

10 lines
923 bytes

In article <> siritzky@acf2.UUCP (Brian Siritzky) writes:
>I would like opinions on whether a invisible floating eye (made so by 
>a wand, of course) should still be able to transfix. I don't think that 
>it should.


Don't forget "The invisible umber hulk's gaze confuses you"!  Sure it does!
How?  It shouldn't!

	Troy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <592@udenva.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!nbires!boulder!cisden!udenva!ttorgers

References: <>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site udenva.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!hao!nbires!boulder!cisden!udenva!ttorgers
From: ttorgers@udenva.UUCP (Troy Torgerson)
Newsgroups: net.games.hack
Subject: Re: Should invisible eyes transfix?!
Message-ID: <592@udenva.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-May-85 19:31:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: udenva.592
Posted: Mon May  6 19:31:43 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 10-May-85 08:12:10 EDT
References: <>
Reply-To: ttorgers@udenva.UUCP (Troy Torgerson)
Organization: U of Denver
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message