Article View: net.general
Article #4369Discussions of removal of net.general
From: Evan Marcus
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1985 23:52
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 1985 23:52
13 lines
1046 bytes
1046 bytes
It's been my impression that the general quantity of net.general has more
than doubled since this discussion came about. Personally I don't think
it's wothwhile, but if a full-blown discussion is to begin, perhaps a
net.general temporary subgroup might be in order??
If it ain't broke, why fix it?
--Evan Marcus
--
{ucbvax|decvax}!vax135!petsd!petfe!evan
...!pedsgd!pedsga!evan
What do you want? Wicker?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<424@petfe.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!ihnp1!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!petsd!petfe!evanShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site petfe.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbdkc1!desoto!packard!edsel!bentley!ihnp1!ihnp4!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!mtung!mtunf!ariel!vax135!petsd!petfe!evan From: evan@petfe.UUCP (Evan Marcus) Newsgroups: net.general Subject: Discussions of removal of net.general Message-ID: <424@petfe.UUCP> Date: Sun, 4-Aug-85 19:52:34 EDT Article-I.D.: petfe.424 Posted: Sun Aug 4 19:52:34 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Aug-85 09:56:31 EDT Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls, N.J. Lines: 13